Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 May 15:104:adv33206.
doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.33206.

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Oral Probiotic in Acne Vulgaris

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Oral Probiotic in Acne Vulgaris

Cristina Eguren et al. Acta Derm Venereol. .

Abstract

The relevance of the gut microbiota in some skin inflammatory diseases, including acne vulgaris, has been emphasized. Probiotics could play a role in the modulation of the microbiota, improving the clinical course of this disease. A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial with patients aged 12 to 30 years with acne vulgaris was conducted. The study product was a capsule composed of the probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (CECT 30031) and the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis (BEA_IDA_0074B). Patients with improvement in the Acne Global Severity Scale were 10/34 (29.41%) in the placebo group compared with 20/40 (50%) in the probiotic group (p = 0.03). A significant reduction (p = 0.03) in the number of non-inflammatory acne lesions was observed in the probiotic group (-18.60 [-24.38 to -12.82]) vs the placebo group (-10.54 [-17.43 to -3.66]). Regarding the number of total lesions, a reduction almost reaching statistical significance (p = 0.06) was observed in the probiotic group (-27.94 [-36.35 to -19.53]) compared with the placebo group (-18.31 [-28.21 to -8.41]). In addition, patients with improvement attending the Global Acne Grading System were 7/34 (20.58%) in the placebo group vs 17/40 (42.50%) in the probiotic group (p = 0.02). The number of adverse events was similar in both groups. The probiotic used in this study was effective and well tolerated, and it should be considered for acne vulgaris patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EN-D, PS-P and VN-L are employees of Bioithas (a sister company of Bionou Research) and VN-L owns stock/stock options.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evolution of the Acne Global Severity Scale (AGSS). Patients with improvement in at least 1 category of less severity during the study in both intervention groups. Since as early as week 4 of treatment the proportion of patients with clinical response according to AGSS was higher in the probiotic group compared with the placebo group. This difference was statistically significant when treatment was completed after 12 weeks of intervention.

References

    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. . Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2163–2196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heng AHS, Chew FT. Systematic review of the epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 5754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhate K, Williams HC. Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol 2013; 168: 474–485. - PubMed
    1. Sánchez-Pellicer P, Navarro-Moratalla L, Núñez-Delegido E, Ruzafa-Costas B, Agüera-Santos J, Navarro-López V. Acne, microbiome, and probiotics: the gut–skin axis. Microorganisms 2022; 10: 1303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ottaviani M, Camera E, Picardo M. Lipid mediators in acne. Mediators Inflamm 2010; 2010: 858176. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms