Improving the quality of patient care in lung cancer: key factors for successful multidisciplinary team working
- PMID: 38751383
- PMCID: PMC11093720
- DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00217
Improving the quality of patient care in lung cancer: key factors for successful multidisciplinary team working
Abstract
International Guidelines as well as Cancer Associations recommend a multidisciplinary approach to lung cancer care. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) can significantly improve treatment decision-making and patient coordination by putting different physicians and other health professionals "in the same room", who collectively decide upon the best possible treatment. However, this is not a panacea for cancer treatment. The impact of multidisciplinary care (MDC) on patient outcomes is not univocal, while the effective functioning of the MDT depends on many factors. This review presents the available MDT literature with an emphasis on the key factors that characterize high-quality patient care in lung cancer. The study was conducted with a bibliographic search using different electronic databases (PubMed Central, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google) referring to multidisciplinary cancer care settings. Many key elements appear consolidated, while others emerge as prevalent and actual, especially those related to visible barriers which work across geographic, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. MDTs must be sustained by strategic management, structured within the entity, and cannot be managed as a separate care process. Furthermore, they need to coordinate with other teams (within and outside the organization) and join with the broad range of services delivered by multiple providers at various points of the cancer journey or within the system, with the vision of integrated care.
Keywords: Multidisciplinary team care; care pathway; multi-team system; multidisciplinary clinic model.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008. PMID: 21631815
-
Multidisciplinary Care of BRAF-Mutant Stage III Melanoma: A Physicians Perspective Review.Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):e1644-e1651. doi: 10.1002/onco.13852. Epub 2021 Jun 26. Oncologist. 2021. PMID: 34080754 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consensus minimum data set for lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: Results of a Delphi process.Respirology. 2018 Oct;23(10):927-934. doi: 10.1111/resp.13307. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Respirology. 2018. PMID: 29641841
Cited by
-
Social Media Behavior Guidelines for Healthcare Professionals: An American Society of Pain and Neuroscience NEURON Project.J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 5;17:3587-3599. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S488590. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 39529946 Free PMC article.
-
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma CT Imaging: How to Measure It Correctly?Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748241301901. doi: 10.1177/10732748241301901. Epub 2025 Mar 16. Cancer Control. 2025. PMID: 40091424 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Victorian cancer multidisciplinary team meeting quality framework [Internet] State of Victoria; c2019 [cited 2022 Sep 6] Available from: https://content.health.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/files/col... .
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources