Achilles tendon rupture primary repair technique: A comparative retrospective study between graft versus no-graft
- PMID: 38751750
- PMCID: PMC11092883
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102417
Achilles tendon rupture primary repair technique: A comparative retrospective study between graft versus no-graft
Abstract
Introduction: Achilles tendon rupture is one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries and accounts to 20 % of all large tendon ruptures The surgical choice of a procedure might play a role in the incidence of postoperative complications. This study aimed to estimate and compare the incidence of complications occurring within a 30-day window following primary surgical repair of the Achilles tendon with or without a graft.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the ACS NSQIP database from 2005 to 2021. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts (primary surgical repair with and without graft).
Results: A total of 7010 patients were included in the analysis. Among the graft group, 10.9 % reported any complication which was double the percentage of complications in the no graft group. Only 3.8 % of the no graft patients had reported systemic complications compared to 8.3 % in the graft group. Chronic steroid use was found to be an effect modifier in the incidence of any complications after primary surgical repair when comparing graft versus no graft (P-value 0.016).
Conclusion: Surgical repairwith tendon graft develops more complications than repairing without graft. Therefore, it is imperative for physicians to strive for an early diagnosis, as any delay in treatment significantly raises the likelihood of complications.
Levels of evidence: III, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Keywords: Complications; Graft repair; Key terms: achilles tendon; NSQIP; Tendon rupture.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Low Risk for Local and Systemic Complications After Primary Repair of 1626 Achilles Tendon Ruptures.Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Jun;10(3):216-226. doi: 10.1177/1938640016676340. Epub 2016 Nov 11. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017. PMID: 27837039
-
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Percutaneous Achilles Repair System Versus Open Technique for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures.Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Nov;36(11):1279-86. doi: 10.1177/1071100715589632. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Foot Ankle Int. 2015. PMID: 26055259
-
Postoperative Complications Following Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture.Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jun;40(6):679-686. doi: 10.1177/1071100719831371. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Foot Ankle Int. 2019. PMID: 30808187
-
Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(3):825-836. doi: 10.1177/03635465211053619. Epub 2021 Dec 15. Am J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 34908499
-
Clinical outcomes of chronic Achilles tendon rupture treated with flexor hallucis longus grafting and flexor hallucis longus grafting plus additional augmentation: A meta-analysis.Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Oct;26(7):717-722. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 28. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020. PMID: 31635958 Review.
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials