Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 1:15:1356300.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1356300. eCollection 2024.

IL-6 receptor antibody treatment improves muscle weakness in experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis mouse model

Affiliations

IL-6 receptor antibody treatment improves muscle weakness in experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis mouse model

Shota Miyake et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. It is caused by pathological autoantibodies against components expressed at neuromuscular junctions, such as acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of MG, and IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibody treatment may provide a novel therapeutic option. In this study, we investigated the effects of IL-6R antibody treatment in an experimental autoimmune MG (EAMG) mouse model. We demonstrated that IL-6R antibody treatment improved muscle weakness, reduced IgG deposition at neuromuscular junctions, and the levels of AChR autoantibodies in serum. In addition, follicular helper T cells and Th17, plasma cells in lymph nodes were lower in IL-6R antibody treated mice. Our findings suggest that IL-6R blockade may be a novel and effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of MG.

Keywords: IL-6; IL-6R antibody; acetylcholine receptor; follicular helper T cells; myasthenia gravis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SM, KS, SO, YK, MB, MK, HT-S, KY, YM, and MN-S were employed by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of IL-6 receptor antibody (MR16-1) treatment on muscle weakness in AChR-immunized mice. Grip strength was measured every week in mice from the CFA-treated control group (black circles), AChR-immunized group (red squares), and AChR-immunized + MR16-1-treated group (blue triangles) (n = 10 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SD. ***p < 0.001 by two-way ANOVA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of IL-6 receptor antibody treatment on deposition of anti-AChR IgG in muscle in AChR-immunized mice. (A) Co-localization of mouse IgG and AChR in the tibialis anterior muscle was detected by co-staining with anti-mouse IgG (green) and alpha-bungarotoxin (red). Nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (blue). (B) Mouse IgG-positive area as a percentage of AChR area was quantified by using HALO AI imaging analysis software in CFA-treated control group (black circles), AChR-immunized group (red squares) and, AChR-immunized + MR16-1-treated group (blue triangles) (n = 10 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of IL-6 receptor antibody treatment on levels of AChR autoantibodies in serum. Anti-mouse AChR IgG (A) and IgG subclasses (B) in serum samples from the CFA-treated control group (black circles), AChR-immunized group (red squares), and AChR-immunized + MR16-1-treated group (blue triangles) were measured by ECL (n = 10 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Steel–Dwass’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of IL-6 receptor antibody treatment on immunophenotype in lymph nodes. Immunophenotyping of EAMG mouse in lymph nodes (A–G) of Naive (black squares), CFA-treated group (black circles), AChR-immunized group (red squares), and AChR-immunized + MR16-1-treated group (blue triangles) (n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meriggioli MN, Sanders DB. Autoimmune myasthenia gravis: emerging clinical and biological heterogeneity. Lancet Neurol. (2009) 8:475–90. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70063-8, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jayam Trouth A, Dabi A, Solieman N, Kurukumbi M, Kalyanam J. Myasthenia gravis: a review. Autoimmune Dis. (2012) 2012:874680: 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2012/874680 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conti-Fine BM, Milani M, Kaminski HJ. Myasthenia gravis: past, present, and future. J Clin Invest. (2006) 116:2843–54. doi: 10.1172/JCI29894, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howard JF, Jr, Utsugisawa K, Benatar M, Murai H, Barohn RJ, Illa I, et al. . Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (REGAIN): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:976–86. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30369-1, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vu T, Meisel A, Mantegazza R, Annane D, Katsuno M, Aguzzi R, et al. . Terminal complement inhibitor Ravulizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis. NEJM Evid. (2022) 1:5. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100066 - DOI - PubMed