Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 31:378:e068921.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068921.

Association of ultra-processed food consumption with colorectal cancer risk among men and women: results from three prospective US cohort studies

Affiliations

Association of ultra-processed food consumption with colorectal cancer risk among men and women: results from three prospective US cohort studies

Lu Wang et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of colorectal cancer among men and women from three large prospective cohorts.

Design: Prospective cohort study with dietary intake assessed every four years using food frequency questionnaires.

Setting: Three large US cohorts.

Participants: Men (n= 46 341) from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014) and women (n=159 907) from the Nurses' Health Study (1986-2014; n=67 425) and the Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2015; n=92 482) with valid dietary intake measurement and no cancer diagnosis at baseline.

Main outcome measure: Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer, estimated using time varying Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors.

Results: 3216 cases of colorectal cancer (men, n=1294; women, n=1922) were documented during the 24-28 years of follow-up. Compared with those in the lowest fifth of ultra-processed food consumption, men in the highest fifth of consumption had a 29% higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.53; P for trend=0.01), and the positive association was limited to distal colon cancer (72% increased risk; hazard ratio 1.72, 1.24 to 2.37; P for trend<0.001). These associations remained significant after further adjustment for body mass index or indicators of nutritional quality of the diet (that is, western dietary pattern or dietary quality score). No association was observed between overall ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer among women. Among subgroups of ultra-processed foods, higher consumption of meat/poultry/seafood based ready-to-eat products (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.44, 1.20 to 1.73; P for trend<0.001) and sugar sweetened beverages (1.21, 1.01 to 1.44; P for trend=0.013) among men and ready-to-eat/heat mixed dishes among women (1.17, 1.01 to 1.36; P for trend=0.02) was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer; yogurt and dairy based desserts were negatively associated with the risk of colorectal cancer among women (hazard ratio 0.83, 0.71 to 0.97; P for trend=0.002).

Conclusions: In the three large prospective cohorts, high consumption of total ultra-processed foods in men and certain subgroups of ultra-processed foods in men and women was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Further studies are needed to better understand the potential attributes of ultra-processed foods that contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support for the submitted work from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Relative contribution (%) of each food group to energy adjusted servings per day of ultra-processed food consumption among men and women. Ultra-processed bread and breakfast foods include breakfast bars, cold breakfast cereal, English muffins, bagels, rolls, rye, pumpernickel bread, white bread, and whole grain bread. Meat/poultry/seafood based ready-to-eat products include bacon/ beef/pork hotdogs, chicken/turkey hotdogs, salami, bologna, processed meat sandwiches, processed meats, sausages, and breaded fish cakes/pieces/sticks. Packaged sweet snacks and desserts include readymade brownies, cake, cookies, doughnuts, pies, muffins or biscuits, sweet roll, coffee cake, candy bars, chocolate bars, energy bars, high protein and low carbohydrate candy bars, apple sauce, jams, jellies, preserves, and honey. Fats, condiments, and sauces include ketchup, red chili sauce, salad dressings, mayonnaise (regular and low fat), salsa, margarine, spread butter, soy sauce, non-dairy coffee whitener, and cream cheese. Sugar or artificially sweetened beverages include caffeine-free Coke, Coke/Pepsi/Cola, dairy coffee drink, Hawaiian punch, low calorie soda, caffeine-free low calorie soda, Pepsi, 7-up, other carbonated beverages, and other low calorie Cola with caffeine. Yogurt and dairy based desserts include frozen yogurt, sherbet, ice cream, artificially sweetened yogurt, and flavored yogurt. Ready-to-eat/heat mixed dishes include pizza, chowder or cream soup, soup made with bouillon, readymade soup from cans, and French fries. Packaged savory snacks include regular crackers, fat-free light crackers, and fat-free popcorn. Other ultra-processed foods include Nutrasweet or equivalent, other artificial sweeteners, and Splenda

References

    1. Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;16:713-32. 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7-30. 10.3322/caac.21442 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toledo E, de A Carmona-Torre F, Alonso A, et al. . Hypothesis-oriented food patterns and incidence of hypertension: 6-year follow-up of the SUN (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) prospective cohort. Public Health Nutr 2010;13:338-49. 10.1017/S1368980009991066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Juul F, Parekh N, Martinez-Steele E, Monteiro CA, Chang VW. Ultra-processed food consumption among US adults from 2001 to 2018. Am J Clin Nutr 2022;115:211-21. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab305 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zinöcker MK, Lindseth IA. The Western Diet-Microbiome-Host Interaction and Its Role in Metabolic Disease. Nutrients 2018;10:365. 10.3390/nu10030365 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources