Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;46(4):977-986.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01734-w. Epub 2024 May 16.

Development and Delphi consensus validation of the Medication-Related Fall screening and scoring tool

Affiliations

Development and Delphi consensus validation of the Medication-Related Fall screening and scoring tool

Dima Saeed et al. Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Falls are a significant public health problem and constitute a major cause of injuries and mortality. Risk factors for falls are multifactorial and include medication use.

Aim: To develop and investigate the content validity of the Medication-Related fall (MRF) screening and scoring tool.

Method: The MRF tool was developed from clinical practice guidelines addressing medication-related problems, and additional medications identified by specialist pharmacists across a region of the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland). Medication classes were categorised according to their 'potential to cause falls' as: high-risk (three points), moderate-risk (two points) or low-risk (one point). The overall medication-related falls risk for the patient was determined by summing the scores for all medications. The MRF was validated using Delphi consensus methodology, whereby three iterative rounds of surveys were conducted using SurveyMonkey®. Twenty-two experts from 10 countries determined their agreement with the falls risk associated with each medication on a 5-point Likert scale. Only medications with at least 75% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing were retained in the next round.

Results: Consensus was reached for 19 medications/medication classes to be included in the final version of the MRF tool; ten were classified as high-risk, eight as moderate-risk and one as low-risk.

Conclusion: The MRF tool is simple and has the potential to be integrated into medicines optimisation to reduce falls risk and negative fall-related outcomes. The score from the MRF tool can be used as a clinical parameter to assess the need for medication review and clinical interventions.

Keywords: Assessment tool; Fall-risk increasing drugs; Falls; Medication review; Older people; Polypharmacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Description of the Delphi approach and study timelines
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of the results of the three iterative rounds of the survey

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization (2017) WHO global patient safety challenge: medication without harm. Available at: https://www.who.int/initiatives/medication-without-harm. Accessed 15 Jan 2024.
    1. Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Martin FC, et al. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing. 2022;51(9):afac205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006;35(Suppl 2):ii37-41. - PubMed
    1. Walsh ME, Boland F, Moriarty F, et al. Modification of potentially inappropriate prescribing following fall-related hospitalizations in older adults. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(5):461–70. - PubMed
    1. Maly J, Dosedel M, Vosatka J, et al. Pharmacotherapy as major risk factor of falls—analysis of 12 months experience in hospitals in South Bohemia. J Appl Biomed. 2019;17(1):60. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources