Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;47(3):519-530.
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2351594. Epub 2024 May 16.

The feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of early weight bearing in humeral fractures - a scoping review

Affiliations

The feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of early weight bearing in humeral fractures - a scoping review

Jia Hui Gan et al. Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Non-weight bearing is often recommended after humeral fractures. This review aims to summarise the extent and nature of the evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of early weight bearing (EWB) in people with humeral fractures, treated operatively or non-operatively. .

Methods: Data sources identified published (PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL) and unpublished (ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL, NIHR Open Research, OpenGrey) literature. Independent data extraction was conducted by two reviewers.

Results: 13 901 records were retrieved. Ten studies, involving 515 post-operative patients and 351 healthcare professionals, were included. EWB was found to be feasible in nine studies. There was limited evidence regarding adherence to EWB. Trauma and orthopaedic surgeons reported that EWB was acceptable. This depended on surgery type and whether it was a post-operative polytrauma case. No acceptability data was reported from patients' perspectives. Only one study reported two patients who developed unsatisfactory outcomes from excessive post-operative EWB. Positive effects of EWB were reported on disability level, pain, shoulder and elbow motion, and union.

Conclusion: There is some evidence for the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of post-operative EWB after humeral fractures. There was limited data on the acceptability of EWB. Heterogeneous study designs, and variations in EWB protocols limit conclusions.

Keywords: Scoping review; early weight bearing; humeral fractures; immediate weight bearing; rehabilitation.

Plain language summary

There is some evidence to support the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of early weight bearing following operative management of humeral fractures.Early weight bearing after some humeral fractures is acceptable to some subspecialities of orthopaedic surgeons but is not universally accepted.Rehabilitation professionals should discuss the option of early weight bearing after operative management of humeral fracture with patients and their multidisciplinary team.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for study selection for this scoping review.

References

    1. Anley C, Vrettos B, Rachuene P, et al. . Proximal humerus fractures - part 1: conservative management. South Afr Orthop J. 2019;18(3):63–71.
    1. Leiblein M, Verboket R, Marzi I, et al. . Nonunions of the humerus – treatment concepts and results of the last five years. Chin J Traumatol. 2019;22(4):187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.04.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B.. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Int J Care Injured. 2006;37(8):691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iglesias-Rodríguez S, Domínguez-Prado DM, García-Reza A, et al. . Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02551-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA.. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(3):407–414. doi: 10.1002/acr.21563. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types