Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0303647.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303647. eCollection 2024.

Human- common hippo (Hippopotamus amphibius)-conflict in the Dhidhessa Wildlife Sanctuary and its surrounding, Southwestern Ethiopia

Affiliations

Human- common hippo (Hippopotamus amphibius)-conflict in the Dhidhessa Wildlife Sanctuary and its surrounding, Southwestern Ethiopia

Girma Gizachew Tefera et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) is one of the most endangered mega herbivore in Africa. Although the human-hippo conflict (HHC) is currently escalating due to habitat loss, little is known about the scope of the conflict and potential mitigation measures. From 2021 to 2022, the extent of HHC, the perception of local inhabitants towards the animal, and its impacts on the conservation of the hippo were assessed within and in the surrounding areas of Dhidhessa Wildlife Sanctuary, southwestern Ethiopia. A total of 227 households were used as a data sources, participating in the questionnaire survey, focus group discussion and key informant interviews. Direct field observations were also used as key data source. Crop raiding and damage (63%, n = 143), was the most severely reported source of conflict, followed by direct human attack (22.9%, n = 52). Livestock predation and increased hippo mortality were also common types of HHC in the area. According to the study, the majority of respondents (74.4%, n = 169) agreed that the trend of conflict was increasing, while 16.7% (n = 38) argued that there was no change. Food scarcities in the buffer zone, as well as agricultural expansion in the area, have been identified as major drivers of HHC. The majority of respondents had a negative attitude toward hippo conservation; however, there were differences based on gender, age, and educational level. The major traditional hippo conflict mitigation strategies in the area include guarding, fencing, and trenching. Field observation revealed that a large extent of the former grazing and ranging areas of hippo in the area are heavily encroached and taken over by large private and public agricultural investments. Vacating and recovering at least the former buffer areas dedicated to the wildlife in the area and modern, non-lethal mitigation strategies are recommended for better conservation and safeguarding of the currently good-sized hippo population of the sanctuary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Map of study area.
(Our team used shape files provided by the Ethiopian Mapping Agency to produce the map. The agency’s official website offers free access to these shape files (http://www.ema.gov.et).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Percentage of respondents reporting damages caused by hippopotamus.
Fig 3
Fig 3. People’s perception on the driving factors of human hippopotamus conflict.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Mitigation measures used by local population to prevent crop damage caused by hippopotamus.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Different mitigation strategies using at the Dhidhessa wildlife sanctuary to prevent hippo attacks: (a) hippo trench, (b) guarding, (c) fire, and (d) killing hippo on the hippo trench.
Fig 6
Fig 6
Dead hippos on the farm around Dhidhessa River: (a) killing hippo on the trench, (b and c) killing hippo on the farm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anand S., & Radhakrishna S. (2017). Investigating trends in human-wildlife conflict: is conflict escalation real or imagined? Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 10(2), 154–161. 10.1016/j.japb.2017.02.003. - DOI
    1. Torres D. F., Oliveira E. S., & Alves R. R. N. (2018). Conflicts Between Humans and Terrestrial Vertebrates: A Global Review. Tropical Conservation Science, 11. 10.1177/1940082918794084 - DOI
    1. Makindi S. M., Mutinda M. N., Olekaikai N. K. W., Olelebo W. L., & Abdillahi A. (2014). Human-Wildlife Conflicts: Causes and Mitigation Measures in Tsavo Conservation Area, Kenya. 3(6), 1025–1031.
    1. Seoraj-Pillai N., & Pillay N. (2017). A meta-analysis of human-wildlife conflict: South African and global perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(1), 1–21. 10.3390/su9010034 - DOI
    1. Mekonen Eritban S. (2016). Population status and human conflict of common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius, LINNAEUS, 1758) In Boye Wetland, Jimma, Ethiopia. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 7(2), 32–40. 10.5251/ajsir.2016.7. - DOI