Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0302373.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302373. eCollection 2024.

Mobilizing grievances in the internet age: The case of national online petitioning in South Korea, 2017-2022

Kayoon Kim  1 , Chan S Suh  2
Affiliations

Mobilizing grievances in the internet age: The case of national online petitioning in South Korea, 2017-2022

Kayoon Kim et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Which kinds of grievances garner support from the public on online platforms? Focusing on national online petitioning, one of the forms of direct democracy in contemporary politics, we examine the content and characteristics of petitions that succeeded in attracting public attention and support. Using our comprehensive data on online petitions that were submitted to the executive office between 2017 and 2022 in South Korea, our analysis yields three important findings. First, a mix of post-materialist topics such as human rights and gender equality and materialist topics such as safety and environment turn out to be salient among petitions that meet the signature threshold. Second, online petitions the contents of which reveal either moral emotions or Confucian attitudes are more likely to gain public support compared to others. Third, keywords that are related to moral claims asking for the apprehension of perpetrators on behalf of victims, such as 'victim,' 'perpetrator,' 'kid,' and 'punishment,' appear most frequently inside the petitions that cross the signature threshold. Such findings provide implications for understanding both the potentials and limitations of national online petitioning in contemporary democracies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The number of petitions filed and passed over time: 2017–2022.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The frequency of keywords in online petitions that meet the signature threshold.
Fig 3
Fig 3. The number of petitions filed and passed by subject.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dahl RA. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale university press; 2008.
    1. Davenport C, editor. Paths to state repression: Human rights violations and contentious politics. Rowman & Littlefield; 2000.
    1. Meyer DS, Tarrow SG, editors. The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman & Littlefield; 1998.
    1. Taylor V. Mobilizing for change in a social movement society. Contemporary Sociology. 2000;29(1):219–30.
    1. Chua LJ. Legal mobilization and authoritarianism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2019;15:355–76.