Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 16:26:e53327.
doi: 10.2196/53327.

Person-Generated Health Data in Women's Health: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Person-Generated Health Data in Women's Health: Scoping Review

Jalisa Lynn Karim et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The increased pervasiveness of digital health technology is producing large amounts of person-generated health data (PGHD). These data can empower people to monitor their health to promote prevention and management of disease. Women make up one of the largest groups of consumers of digital self-tracking technology.

Objective: In this scoping review, we aimed to (1) identify the different areas of women's health monitored using PGHD from connected health devices, (2) explore personal metrics collected through these technologies, and (3) synthesize facilitators of and barriers to women's adoption and use of connected health devices.

Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for scoping reviews, we searched 5 databases for articles published between January 1, 2015, and February 29, 2020. Papers were included if they targeted women or female individuals and incorporated digital health tools that collected PGHD outside a clinical setting.

Results: We included a total of 406 papers in this review. Articles on the use of PGHD for women steadily increased from 2015 to 2020. The health areas that the articles focused on spanned several topics, with pregnancy and the postpartum period being the most prevalent followed by cancer. Types of digital health used to collect PGHD included mobile apps, wearables, websites, the Internet of Things or smart devices, 2-way messaging, interactive voice response, and implantable devices. A thematic analysis of 41.4% (168/406) of the papers revealed 6 themes regarding facilitators of and barriers to women's use of digital health technology for collecting PGHD: (1) accessibility and connectivity, (2) design and functionality, (3) accuracy and credibility, (4) audience and adoption, (5) impact on community and health service, and (6) impact on health and behavior.

Conclusions: Leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, the adoption of digital health tools to address women's health concerns was on a steady rise. The prominence of tools related to pregnancy and the postpartum period reflects the strong focus on reproductive health in women's health research and highlights opportunities for digital technology development in other women's health topics. Digital health technology was most acceptable when it was relevant to the target audience, was seen as user-friendly, and considered women's personalization preferences while also ensuring accuracy of measurements and credibility of information. The integration of digital technologies into clinical care will continue to evolve, and factors such as liability and health care provider workload need to be considered. While acknowledging the diversity of individual needs, the use of PGHD can positively impact the self-care management of numerous women's health journeys. The COVID-19 pandemic has ushered in increased adoption and acceptance of digital health technology. This study could serve as a baseline comparison for how this field has evolved as a result.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/26110.

Keywords: digital health; femtech; health app; mobile health; mobile phone; patient-generated health data; person-generated health data; personalized health; scoping review; self-tracking; wearables; women’s health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of publications by country.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study type by year of publication.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Health areas of focus by year of publication.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conceptualizing a data infrastructure for the capture, use, and sharing of patient-generated health data in care delivery and research through 2024. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2018. Jan, [2024-05-03]. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/onc_pghd_final_white_paper.pdf .
    1. DeSilva J, Prensky-Pomeranz R, Zweig M. Digital health consumer adoption report 2020. RockHealth. 2021. Feb 26, [2024-05-03]. https://rockhealth.com/insights/digital-health-consumer-adoption-report-... .
    1. Taylor P. Penetration of mobile devices in Canada as share of the population from 2009 to 2021. Statista. [2024-05-03]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/462386/mobile-device-penetration-canada .
    1. Olsen E. Digital health apps balloon to more than 350,000 available on the market, according to IQVIA report. MobiHealthNews. 2021. Aug 4, [2024-05-03]. https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/digital-health-apps-balloon-more-350... .
    1. Paré G, Leaver C, Bourget C. Diffusion of the digital health self-tracking movement in Canada: results of a national survey. J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 02;20(5):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9388.v20i5e177 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types