The variability of MCID, SCB, PASS, and MOI thresholds for PROMs in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review
- PMID: 38754543
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.051
The variability of MCID, SCB, PASS, and MOI thresholds for PROMs in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a common procedure utilized to address degenerative pathologies of the glenohumeral joint and rotator cuff. Increased reliance on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have placed emphasis on the utilization of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and maximal outcome improvement (MOI) thresholds to assess the clinical efficacy of RTSA. In this study, we systematically reviewed the MCID, SCB, PASS, and MOI thresholds reported for PROMs following RTSA.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were queried for articles from January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2023 reporting MCID, SCB, PASS, or MOI values for PROMs following RTSA. Patient demographic data, study characteristics, MCID/SCB/PASS/MOI thresholds, and threshold calculation methods were extracted.
Results: One hundred and forty-one articles were screened with 39 ultimately included, comprising 11,984 total patients that underwent RTSA. 34 (87%) studies reported MCID thresholds, 20 (51%) reported SCB, 5 (13%) reported PASS, and 2 (5%) reported MOI. 25/39 (64%) studies referenced a previous study when reporting MCID, SCB, PASS, or MOI values, 11 (28%) used an anchor-based method to calculate threshold values, 1 (3%) used a distribution-based method, and 2 (5%) used both anchor and distribution methods. There were 19 newly calculated MCID (11), SCB (5), PASS (1), and MOI (2) thresholds. For 5 of the 6 most utilized PROMs (ASES, SST, Constant, UCLA, and SPADI), the range of reported MCID values exceeded 50% of the most common threshold. For 3 of 6, the range of SCB values exceeded 25% of the most common threshold.
Conclusion: There is substantial variability in the MCID and SCB threshold values reported in the RTSA literature. Standardizing the methodologic calculation and utilization of MCID, SCB, PASS, and MOI thresholds for RTSA may allow for improved assessment of PROMs.
Keywords: MCID; MOI; PASS; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; SCB; patient-reported outcome measure.
Copyright © 2024 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A novel methodology for establishing minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit thresholds for patient-reported outcome measures following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Mar 13:S1058-2746(25)00219-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.018. Online ahead of print. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025. PMID: 40089007
-
The variability of minimum clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025 Mar 6;5(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.01.012. eCollection 2025 Aug. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025. PMID: 40697307 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Variability of MCID, SCB, and PASS Thresholds in Studies Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review.Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jul;52(9):2424-2432. doi: 10.1177/03635465231202019. Epub 2024 Feb 6. Am J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38318661
-
Stratification of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after total shoulder arthroplasty by implant type, preoperative diagnosis, and sex.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):e492-e506. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.040. Epub 2024 Mar 8. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024. PMID: 38461936
-
Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):e516-e527. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 May 11. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023. PMID: 37178967
Cited by
-
Surgical Outcomes of Weight-Bearing Shoulders: Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(3):438-452. doi: 10.4055/cios24238. Epub 2025 Jan 7. Clin Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 40454117 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources