Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 16;7(1):585.
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06254-x.

Mercury contamination is an invisible threat to declining migratory shorebirds along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway

Affiliations

Mercury contamination is an invisible threat to declining migratory shorebirds along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway

Yanju Ma et al. Commun Biol. .

Abstract

Exposure to pollutants is a potentially crucial but overlooked driver of population declines in shorebirds along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. We combined knowledge of moult strategy and life history with a standardised sampling protocol to assess mercury (Hg) contamination in 984 individuals across 33 migratory shorebird species on an intercontinental scale. Over one-third of the samples exceeded toxicity benchmarks. Feather Hg was best explained by moulting region, while habitat preference (coastal obligate vs. non-coastal obligate), the proportion of invertebrates in the diet and foraging stratum (foraging mostly on the surface vs. at depth) also contributed, but were less pronounced. Feather Hg was substantially higher in South China (Mai Po and Leizhou), Australia and the Yellow Sea than in temperate and Arctic breeding ranges. Non-coastal obligate species (Tringa genus) frequently encountered in freshwater habitats were at the highest risk. It is important to continue and expand biomonitoring research to assess how other pollutants might impact shorebirds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Total Hg (THg) concentration in feathers of different shorebird species along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway.
Vertical red dashed lines show Hg toxicity thresholds, from left to right, representing low risk (1.62 mg/kg), moderate risk (4.53 mg/kg), high risk (9.14 mg/kg), and severe risk (10.99 mg/kg). For each species, the number in parentheses indicates the sample size. Boxplots show median and 25% and 75% quartiles. Species are ranked by median feather THg concentrations. Scientific names can be found in Supplementary Data 1 and 2 (all species) and in Table 1. The x-axis is truncated at 18 mg/kg for clarity; one individual data point of 38.63 mg/kg from a Marsh Sandpiper is not shown.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Hg concentration in feathers based on model estimations vs. observed calculations.
The number of observations used here was 742. Left: the estimated marginal means (log10 transformed THg concentration) for the region on the full model (logHg ~ Region + Habitat Preference + Foraging Stratum + Diet + (1|Species) + (1|Year)). Right: the observed means of total Hg concentration in feathers. The standard errors of both means are indicated by red horizontal bars. The blue vertical lines indicate the estimated 95% CI while the black vertical dash lines indicate the observed 95% CI.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Sampling sites along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway.
1: Yalujiang; 2: Tiaozini; 3: Chongming Dongtan; 4: Yangkou; 5: Mai Po; 6: Leizhou; 7: Taylors Lagoon; 8: Coconut Well Beach; 9: Lake Eda; 10: Roebuck Bay; 11: 80 Mile Beach; 12: Beachport; 13: Canunda; 14: Nene Valley; 15: Brown Bay; 16: Port Phillip Bay; 17: Western Port; 18: Corner Inlet. Sites are numbered in order of latitude. Map layers were provided by Esri, FAO, NOAA, and USGS (ArcGIS Pro 3.0.2).

References

    1. Colwell, M. A. Shorebird Ecology, Conservation, and Management. (University of California Press, 2010).
    1. Yong DL, et al. Migratory songbirds in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway: a review from a conservation perspective. Bird. Conserv. Int. 2015;25:1–37. doi: 10.1017/S0959270914000276. - DOI
    1. Barter, M. Shorebirds of the Yellow Sea: Importance, Threats and Conservation Status. (International Wader Studies, 2002).
    1. Studds CE, et al. Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14895. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14895. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. www.iucnredlist.org (2023).

Publication types