ASO Author Reflections: The Commission on Cancer's Role in Quality Procedures that Govern the National Cancer Database

Affiliations

Bryan E Palis et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep.

. 2024 Sep;31(9):5585-5586.

doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15465-9. Epub 2024 May 16.

No abstract available

References

1. Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):747–55. - DOI
1. Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):756–64. - DOI
1. Palis BE, Janczewski LM, Browner AE, et al. National Cancer Database conforms with standardized framework for registry and data quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15393-8 . - DOI
1. Knutson AC, McNamara EJ, McKellar DP, Kaufman CS, Winchester DP. The role of the American College of Surgeons’ cancer program accreditation in influencing oncologic outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(5):611–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23680 . (Epub 2014 Jul 8 PMID: 25042831). - DOI
1. American College of Surgeons. Commission on Cancer Optimal Resources for Cancer Care. January 2020. Available at: https://www.facs.or/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards/2020 . Accessed 22 April 2024.