Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Jul;38(7):1522-1533.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02278-8. Epub 2024 May 16.

Asciminib monotherapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia with the T315I mutation after ≥1 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor: 2-year follow-up results

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Asciminib monotherapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia with the T315I mutation after ≥1 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor: 2-year follow-up results

Jorge E Cortes et al. Leukemia. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Asciminib targets the BCR::ABL1 myristoyl pocket, maintaining activity against BCR::ABL1T315I, which is resistant to most approved adenosine triphosphate-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We report updated phase I results (NCT02081378) assessing safety/tolerability and antileukemic activity of asciminib monotherapy 200 mg twice daily in 48 heavily pretreated patients with T315I-mutated chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP; data cutoff: January 6, 2021). With 2 years' median exposure, 56.3% of patients continued receiving asciminib. Overall, 62.2% of evaluable patients achieved BCR::ABL1 ≤1% on the International Scale (IS); 47.6% and 81.3% of ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients, respectively, achieved BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%. Of 45 evaluable patients, 48.9% achieved a major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.1%), including 34.6% and 68.4% of ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients, respectively. MMR was maintained until data cutoff in 19 of 22 patients who achieved it. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included increased lipase level (18.8%) and thrombocytopenia (14.6%). Five (10.4%) patients experienced AEs leading to discontinuation, including 2 who discontinued asciminib and died due to COVID-19; these were the only deaths reported. These results show asciminib's effectiveness, including in almost 50% of ponatinib pretreated patients, and confirm its risk-benefit profile, supporting its use as a treatment option for T315I-mutated CML-CP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JEC Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Sun Pharma, Terns Pharma, Incyte, and Bristol Myers Squibb: consulting fees; Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Sun Pharma, Ascentage: institutional research support. KS Novartis: research funding, honoraria. D-WK Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, IL-YANG, and Takeda: grants. TPH Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Enliven: consultancy, research funding. GE BMS, Incyte Biosciences, Novartis, and Pfizer: speaker. MJM Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Pfizer: personal fees. AH Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer: institutional research support; Novartis and Incyte: institutional research support, personal fees. FL Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, and Celgene: consultancy, honoraria; Novartis: consultancy, honoraria, and research funding. MCH Novartis, Deciphera, Theseus, and Blueprint Medicines: consultancy; Deciphera: speaker’s bureau; Jonathan David Foundation, VA Merit Review Grant (I01BX005358), and NCI R21 grant (R21CA263400): partial salary support. Prior to 2019, MCH held an equity interest in MolecularMD. MCH holds multiple patents on the diagnosis and/or treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors; one patent on treatment has been licensed by Oregon Health & Science University to Novartis. MB Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Pfizer, Incyte, and Novartis: consultancy and honoraria; AbbVie: consultancy. MD Fusion Pharma, Blueprint, Pfizer, Novartis, Medscape, and Sangamo: consultancy; Pfizer: research funding; Takeda, Sangamo, and Blueprint: membership on board of directors or advisory committees. YTG Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, MSD Pharma, Novartis, EUSA Pharma, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie: honoraria. JJWMJ Novartis and Bristol Myers Squibb: research funding; Incyte: speaker’s fee; AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and Incyte: honoraria; AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen-Cilag, Olympus, Incyte, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Jazz, and Takeda: support for Apps for Care and Science nonprofit foundation of which J.J.W.M.J. is president. MT IMAGO: consultancy; Novartis and Takeda: research funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb: membership on board of directors or advisory committees. VGGS Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Incyte: grants, nonfinancial support, and honoraria. PC Pfizer, Novartis, and Incyte: honoraria. DJD AbbVie, Novartis, Blueprint, and GlycoMimetics: grants; AbbVie, Novartis, Blueprint, and GlycoMimetics: research funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Autolus, Blueprint, Forty-Seven, GlycoMimetics, Incyte, Jazz, Kite, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and Takeda; consulting. AbbVie, Amgen, Autolus, Blueprint, Forty-Seven, GlycoMimetics, Incyte, Jazz, Kite, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, and Takeda: personal fees. AD, SC, FP, and NA are employees of Novartis. DR Novartis, Pfizer, and Incyte: personal fees.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Cumulative molecular response in ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients without the indicated response at baseline.
Cumulative (A) BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%, (B) MMR, (C) MR4, and (D) MR4.5 in evaluable patients. IS International Scale, MMR major molecular response, MR4 BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.01%, MR4.5 BCR::ABL1IS ≤0.0032%. a CIs are based on the Clopper–Pearson method. 95% CIs were used for all patients, and 90% CIs were used for ponatinib-pretreated and -naive patients. b The rate of MMR by week 24 was 42.2% (95% CI, 27.7–57.8%) in all patients, 57.9% (90% CI, 36.8–77.0%) in ponatinib-naive patients, and 30.8% (90% CI, 16.3–48.7%) in ponatinib-pretreated patients. c The rate of MMR by week 48 was 44.4% (95% CI, 29.6–60.0%) in all patients, 57.9% (90% CI, 36.8–77.0%) in ponatinib-naive patients, and 34.6% (90% CI, 19.4–52.6%) in ponatinib-pretreated patients. d The rate of MMR by week 96 was 48.9% (95% CI, 33.7–64.2%) in all patients, 68.4% (90% CI, 47.0–85.3%) ponatinib-naive patients, and 34.6% (90% CI, 19.4–52.6%) in ponatinib-pretreated patients.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Cumulative BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% by time point in patients with baseline BCR::ABL1IS > 1%a.
Cumulative BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% in all evaluable patients (A) overall, (B) by BCR::ABL1IS at baseline, and (C) by prior treatment with ponatinib. IS International Scale. a Treatment discontinuations for any reason were treated as competing events.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Cumulative MMR by time point in patients not in MMR at baseline.
a Cumulative MMR in all evaluable patients (A) overall, (B) by BCR::ABL1IS at baseline, and (C) by prior treatment with ponatinib. IS International Scale, MMR major molecular response. a Treatment discontinuations for any reason were treated as competing events.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Adverse reactions (≥10% at first occurrence) over time.
a,bADR adverse drug reaction, AE adverse event, LRTI lower respiratory tract infection, URTI upper respiratory tract infection. a Includes reported AEs and adverse drug reactions. b Proportions are calculated based on the number of patients at risk of an event (ie, patients ongoing treatment and event-free at the start of the interval). A patient with multiple occurrences of an event in the same time interval is counted only once in that time interval. The safety topics correspond to either single preferred terms or groups of preferred terms according to the adverse drug reaction definitions.

References

    1. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34:966–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel AB, O’Hare T, Deininger MW. Mechanisms of resistance to ABL kinase inhibition in chronic myeloid leukemia and the development of next generation ABL kinase inhibitors. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2017;31:589–612. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cortes J, Lang F. Third-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia: current status and future directions. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akard LP, Albitar M, Hill CE, Pinilla-Ibarz J. The “hit hard and hit early” approach to the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: implications of the updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines for routine practice. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2013;11:421–32.
    1. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Cortes J. Use of second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: an evolving treatment paradigm. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015;15:323–34. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources