Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jun;129(6):864-878.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01817-8. Epub 2024 May 17.

A multicentric study of radiomics and artificial intelligence analysis on contrast-enhanced mammography to identify different histotypes of breast cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A multicentric study of radiomics and artificial intelligence analysis on contrast-enhanced mammography to identify different histotypes of breast cancer

Antonella Petrillo et al. Radiol Med. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of radiomic analysis on contrast-enhanced mammography images to identify different histotypes of breast cancer mainly in order to predict grading, to identify hormone receptors, to discriminate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and to identify luminal histotype of the breast cancer.

Methods: From four Italian centers were recruited 180 malignant lesions and 68 benign lesions. However, only the malignant lesions were considered for the analysis. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced mammography in cranium caudal (CC) and medium lateral oblique (MLO) view. Considering histological findings as the ground truth, four outcomes were considered: (1) G1 + G2 vs. G3; (2) HER2 + vs. HER2 - ; (3) HR + vs. HR - ; and (4) non-luminal vs. luminal A or HR + /HER2- and luminal B or HR + /HER2 + . For multivariate analysis feature selection, balancing techniques and patter recognition approaches were considered.

Results: The univariate findings showed that the diagnostic performance is low for each outcome, while the results of the multivariate analysis showed that better performances can be obtained. In the HER2 + detection, the best performance (73% of accuracy and AUC = 0.77) was obtained using a linear regression model (LRM) with 12 features extracted by MLO view. In the HR + detection, the best performance (77% of accuracy and AUC = 0.80) was obtained using a LRM with 14 features extracted by MLO view. In grading classification, the best performance was obtained by a decision tree trained with three predictors extracted by MLO view reaching an accuracy of 82% on validation set. In the luminal versus non-luminal histotype classification, the best performance was obtained by a bagged tree trained with 15 predictors extracted by CC view reaching an accuracy of 94% on validation set.

Conclusions: The results suggest that radiomics analysis can be effectively applied to design a tool to support physician decision making in breast cancer classification. In particular, the classification of luminal versus non-luminal histotypes can be performed with high accuracy.

Keywords: Breast cancer classification and prediction; Contrast-enhanced mammography; Machine learning; Radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Patel BK, Lobbes M, Lewin J (2018) Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a review. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 39:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2017.08.005 - DOI
    1. Heywang-Köbrunner S, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Küchler C (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01142-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Satake H, Ishigaki S, Ito R, Naganawa S (2022) Radiomics in breast MRI: current progress toward clinical application in the era of artificial intelligence. Radiol Med 127(1):39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01423-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S, Mathieu MC, Rochard F, Opolon P, Sigal R (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:528–537. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1944 - DOI
    1. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Garbay JR, Delalogeet S (2009) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 69:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.035 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources