Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;53(6):2025-2033.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02871-z. Epub 2024 May 16.

Sex Doll Specifications versus Human Body Characteristics

Affiliations

Sex Doll Specifications versus Human Body Characteristics

Kenneth R Hanson et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Sex dolls have been criticized for reproducing unrealistic expectations about human bodies. Yet precise sex doll measurements are lacking in the literature nor has there been any systematic attempt to determine the extent to which sex dolls exaggerate human characteristics. To address this gap, we compared the specifications of sex dolls marketed in the USA with the characteristics of women and men living in the USA. Specifically, we tested if and to what degree female dolls were slimmer (H1) and male dolls more muscular (H2) than female and male humans, respectively. Furthermore, we tested if and to what degree female dolls' breasts (H3) and male dolls' penises (H4) were larger than those of women and men. We also tested if sex dolls' observed race/ethnicity was more often White than that of the US population (H5). In 2023, we collected the measures of all 757 full-body sex dolls marketed by the US retailer SexyRealSexDolls.com. Body measures from the US population were extracted from scientific literature. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed using R. All hypotheses were fully or partially confirmed, which indicated that sex dolls marketed in the USA are not realistic depictions of the US population but hypergendered (H1, H2), hypersexualized (H3, H4), and racially fetishized (H5). Implications of the lack of realism are discussed.

Keywords: Racial fetishization; Sex dolls; Sex robots; Sex tech; Sex toys.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

References

    1. Belladelli F, Del Giudice F, Glover F, Mulloy E, Muncey W, Basran S, Fallara G, Pozzi E, Montorsi F, Salonia A, Eisenberg ML. Worldwide temporal trends in penile length: A systemic review and meta analysis. The World Journal of Men’s Health. 2023;41:e31. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220203. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Björkas R, Larsson M. Sex dolls in the Swedish media discourse: Intimacy, sexuality, and technology. Sexuality & Culture. 2021;25:1227–1248. doi: 10.1007/s12119-021-09829-6. - DOI
    1. Cassidy V. For the love of doll(s): A patriarchal nightmare of cyborg couplings. English Studies Canada. 2016;42(1):203–215. doi: 10.1353/esc.2016.0001. - DOI
    1. Desbuleux JC, Fuss J. Is the anthropomorphization of sex dolls associated with objectification and hostility toward women? A mixed method study among doll users. Journal of Sex Research. 2023;60(2):206–220. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2022.2103071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Desbuleux JC, Fuss J. The self-reported sexual real-world consequences of sex doll use. Journal of Sex Research. 2023 doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2199727. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types