Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 16;24(1):597.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12279-6.

Insights for clinical management from the real-life data of the centralized West of Scotland biliary cancer clinic

Affiliations

Insights for clinical management from the real-life data of the centralized West of Scotland biliary cancer clinic

Valentina Zanuso et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: With the increasing of novel therapeutics for the treatment of Biliary Tract Cancers (BTC), and the need to assess their socio-economic impacts for national licence approvals, it is as important as ever to have real-life data in national populations.

Methods and results: We performed an audit of the first 2 year-activity (Sep 2019-Sep 2021) of the centralized West-of-Scotland-BTC clinic. 122 patients accessed the service, including 68% with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 27% with gallbladder cancer (GBC), and 5% with ampulla of Vater carcinoma with biliary phenotype (AVC). Median age at diagnosis was 66 (28-84), with 30% of newly diagnosed patients being younger than 60 years-old. Thirty-five cases (29%) underwent surgery, followed by adjuvant-chemotherapy in 66%. 60% had recurrent disease (80% with distant relapse). Sixty-four patients (58%) started first-line Systemic-AntiCancer-Treatment (SACT). Of these, 37% received second line SACT, the majority of which had iCCA and GBC. Thirty-% of those who progressed received third line SACT.

Conclusions: About 30% of BTC were eligible for curative surgery. Fifty-eight and twenty% of the overall cohort of advanced BTC patients received first and second line SACT. Our data suggest that reflex genomic profiling may not be cost-effective until molecularly driven strategies are limited to second line setting.

Keywords: Biliary cancer; Chemotherapy; Cholangiocarcinoma; Genomic profiling; Scotland; Systemic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: CB received honoraria as speaker (Astrazeneca, Incyte, Servier) and consultant (Incyte, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astrazeneca), received research funds (Avacta, Medannex, Servier) and her spouse is an employee of Astrazeneca. VZ, TN, RC, GA, OP and JM have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of new diagnoses per year in the population of the WoS-BTC clinic between September 2019 and September 2021. Abbreviations: BTC, biliary tract cancers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Histology according to BTC subtype. Abbreviations: BTC, biliary tract cancers; iCCA, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; pCCA, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; dCCA, distal cholangiocarcinoma; GBC, gallbladder cancer; AVC, carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ECOG PS at BTC diagnosis. Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; BTC, biliary tract cancers; iCCA, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; pCCA, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; dCCA, distal cholangiocarcinoma; GBC, gallbladder cancer; AVC, carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Median time to recurrence according to nodal status (A) and status of surgical margins (B)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Overall survival from diagnosis (A) and from beginning of first line (B)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Management of BTC at the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre from 2019 to 2021. Abbreviations: BTC, biliary tract cancers; iCCA, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; pCCA, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; dCCA, distal cholangiocarcinoma; GBC, gallbladder cancer; AVC, carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater; BSC, best supportive care; SOC, standard of care; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; n/a, not available

References

    1. Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(9):557–88. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0310-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marin JJG, Prete MG, Lamarca A, Tavolari S, Landa-Magdalena A, Brandi G, et al. Current and novel therapeutic opportunities for systemic therapy in biliary cancer. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(7):1047–59. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0987-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogel A, Bridgewater J, Edeline J, Kelley RK, Klümpen HJ, Malka D, et al. Biliary tract cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(2):127–40. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.506. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, Malik HZ, Prasad R, Mirza D, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663–73. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30915-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zalin-Miller A, Jose S, Knott C, Paley L, Tataru D, Morement H, et al. Regional variation in routes to diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in England from 2006 to 2017. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(24):3825–42. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i24.3825. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources