Laughter in everyday life: an event-based experience sampling method study using wrist-worn wearables
- PMID: 38756489
- PMCID: PMC11096579
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296955
Laughter in everyday life: an event-based experience sampling method study using wrist-worn wearables
Abstract
Laughter is a universal, nonverbal vocal expression of broad significance for humans. Interestingly, rather little is known about how often we laugh and how laughter is associated with our personality. In a large, event-based, experience sampling method study (N = 52; k = 9,261 assessments) using wrist-worn wearables and a physical analogue scale, we analyzed belly laughs and fit of laughter events in participants' everyday life for 4 weeks. Additionally, we assessed associations with laughter frequency such as personality, happiness, life satisfaction, gelotophobia (i.e., fear of being laughed at), and cheerfulness. Validating our new measurement approach (i.e., wearables, physical analogue scale), laughter events elicited higher happiness ratings compared to reference assessments, as expected. On average, participants reported 2.5 belly laughs per day and on every fourth day a fit of laughter. As expected, participants who were happier and more satisfied with their life laughed more frequently than unhappier, unsatisfied participants. Women and younger participants laughed significantly more than men and older participants. Regarding personality, laughter frequency was positively associated with openness and conscientiousness. No significant association was found for gelotophobia, and results for cheerfulness and related concepts were mixed. By using state-of-the-art statistical methods (i.e., recurrent event regression) for the event-based, multi-level data on laughter, we could replicate past results on laughing.
Keywords: experience sampling; fit of laughter; gelotophobia; gender; laughing; personality; physical analogue scale; wearable.
Copyright © 2024 Stieger, Volsa, Willinger, Lewetz and Batinic.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Testing the associations between dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at and romantic jealousy in couples: An APIM analysis.J Pers. 2021 Oct;89(5):883-898. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12621. Epub 2021 Feb 17. J Pers. 2021. PMID: 33550593
-
Tendency to laugh is a stable trait: findings from a round-robin conversation study.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 7;377(1863):20210187. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0187. Epub 2022 Sep 21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36126663 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences on laugh-related traits: A cross-sectional study.Int J Psychol. 2019 Oct;54(5):621-627. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12520. Epub 2018 Aug 7. Int J Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30088274
-
A lifetime of fear of being laughed at: an aged perspective.Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Feb;43(1):36-41. doi: 10.1007/s00391-009-0083-z. Epub 2009 Dec 17. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010. PMID: 20013341 Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Bluetooth-sensed social presence is associated with immediate vigor and delayed fatigue: A multi-method time series analysis.iScience. 2025 May 22;28(6):112726. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112726. eCollection 2025 Jun 20. iScience. 2025. PMID: 40546944 Free PMC article.
-
Liberating the mental health and wellbeing benefits of laughing alone: a new taxonomic model and scoping review for future research.Discov Ment Health. 2025 Apr 28;5(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00183-9. Discov Ment Health. 2025. PMID: 40295448 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
-
- Ben-Shachar M., Lüdecke D., Makowski D. (2020). Effectsize: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. J. Open Source Softw. 5:2815. doi: 10.21105/joss.02815 - DOI
-
- Bolger N., Laurenceau J.-P. (2013). Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research, New York: Guilford Press.
-
- Brauer K., Proyer R. T. (2020). Judging dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at from short self-descriptions at zero-acquaintance: testing self-other agreement, consensus, and accuracy. J. Res. Pers. 89:104016. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104016 - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous