Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25:23:100382.
doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100382. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Provider's exposure to diversity contributes to socioeconomic disparities in lumbar and cervical fusion outcomes

Gavin Touponse  1 , Karen Malacon  1 , Guan Li  1 , Ezra Yoseph  1 , Summer Han  1   2 , Corinna Zygourakis  1
Affiliations

Provider's exposure to diversity contributes to socioeconomic disparities in lumbar and cervical fusion outcomes

Gavin Touponse et al. World Neurosurg X. .

Abstract

Background: Studies report patient race, income, and education influence spinal fusion outcomes; fewer studies, however, examine the influence of provider factors such as exposure to diversity or cultural sensitivity.

Objective: To examine how providers' experience with diverse patient populations affects spinal fusion outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective review of 39,680 patients undergoing lumbar and cervical fusions, 2003-2021, in Clinformatics® Data Mart national database. We used the provider patient racial diversity index (pRDI)-a published metric of physician exposure to diverse patients-to divide patients into groups based their provider's category (I, II, III) where patients treated by category III providers had surgeons with the most diverse patient populations. Multivariate regression models on propensity score-matched cohorts examined the association between patient SES and provider category on post-operative outcomes.

Results: Black patients had decreased discharge home (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54-0.83) compared to white patients. Patients treated by category III providers had increased length of stay (Coeff. 0.62; 95% CI 0.43-0.81), charge (Coeff. 36800; 95% CI 29,200-44,400), and decreased discharge home (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83-0.97) compared to patients treated by category I providers. Asian patients treated by category II providers had decreased readmission (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14-0.96), and Black patients treated by category III providers had increased discharge home (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.1-1.9) compared to those treated by category I providers.

Conclusion: While our study found two specific instances of improved spine surgery outcomes for minority patients treated by providers serving diverse patient populations, we present mixed findings overall. This study serves as the foundation for future research to better understand how provider pRDI affects outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery.

Keywords: Healthcare disparities; Provider patient racial diversity index; Race; Socioeconomic status; Spinal fusion; Spine outcomes; Spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Histogram of the provider patient racial diversity index divided into three categories with defined cut-offs. U.S. map of (B) the provider patient racial diversity index and (C) the number of lumbar and cervical fusion surgeries by state. Total n = 39,680.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Outcome trends across provider pRDI category among minority patients (Black, Asian, Hispanic) from the matched cohort for (A) 30-day readmission, (B) 30-day reoperation, (C) 30-day complication, (D) 30-day ER visits, (E) discharge to home, (F) hospital length of stay, (G) total hospital charges, and (H) out-of-pocket charges. Total n = 3,187.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rajaee S.S., Bae H.W., Kanim L.E.A., Delamarter R.B. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine. 2012;37(1):67–76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reisener M.J., Pumberger M., Shue J., Girardi F.P., Hughes A.P. Trends in lumbar spinal fusion—a literature review. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(4):752–761. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-492. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen S.A., White R.S., Tangel V., Nachamie A.S., Witkin L.R. Sociodemographic characteristics predict readmission rates after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Pain Med. 2019 doi: 10.1093/pm/pny316. Published online February 6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jin M.C., Hsin G., Ratliff J., et al. Modifiers of and disparities in palliative and supportive care timing and utilization among neurosurgical patients with malignant central nervous system tumors. Cancers. 2022;14(10):2567. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102567. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castillo R.J., Guo K.L. A framework for cultural competence in health care organizations. Health Care Manag. 2011;30(3):205–214. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318225dfe6. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources