Effects of flavoring additives on feed intake, growth performance, temperament, and markers of immune function for newly received feedlot cattle
- PMID: 38757251
- PMCID: PMC11161901
- DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae139
Effects of flavoring additives on feed intake, growth performance, temperament, and markers of immune function for newly received feedlot cattle
Abstract
Ninety Angus × Hereford steers (259.9 ± 36.18 kg body weight [BW]) were used in a 56-d experiment to assess the effects of flavoring additives on feed intake, and stress and immune response of newly received feedlot cattle. Steers were homogenously distributed by BW into six pens equipped with an individual feed intake monitoring system, and pen was randomly assigned to one of three treatments (15 heads per pen; 30 heads per treatment): a standard feedlot receiving diet (CT), or the same diet with a flavoring additive comprised of either sweeteners (Luctarom Feedlot, SW) or a mix of basic tastes (Luctarom Feedlot Mix, MX) at 1 kg/mT. Pens were equipped with a feed intake monitoring system, while BW, chute behavior, flight speed, blood and saliva samples were collected bi-weekly, and hair samples were collected at 4-wk intervals during the study. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for a pen study using individual animal records with repeated measures. There was a treatment × week interaction (P < 0.01) where meal duration was greater in SW steers than MX and CT on week 3, and then CT on weeks 7 and 8. A trend for treatment × week interaction (P = 0.06) showed that the number of visits per day tended to be greater in SW than MX steers on weeks 4 and 5, and it tended to be greater in SW than MX and CT on week 5. The concentration of IL-6 was greater (P < 0.01) on days 1 and 28 than on day 14. The IgM concentration was greater (P < 0.01) on day 1 compared to days 14, 28, and 56. The concentration of haptoglobin was greater (P < 0.01) on 14 than days 28, 42, and 56, and it was greater (P < 0.01) on day 1 than days 42 and 56. The concentration of serum amyloid A was greater (P < 0.01) on day 1 compared to the rest of sampling days. Fibrinogen concentration was greater (P < 0.01) on day 1 compared to days 14 and 42. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was greater (P < 0.01) on days 42 and 56 compared to days 1 and 28, and greater (P < 0.01) on day 14 compared to day 28. Hair and saliva cortisol concentrations were lower (P < 0.01) on day 56 compared to days 1 and 28, respectively. The use of flavoring additives, particularly when based on sweeteners (SW), caused some changes in the feeding pattern of newly received steers. These changes, however, were not consistent over the 56-d feeding period and were not accompanied by a change in growth performance, temperament, biomarkers of stress, inflammation, or immune function.
Keywords: receiving calves; sensory additives; sweetener.
Plain language summary
Feedlot-receiving calves are typically exposed to a series of stressful events, such as weaning, transportation, commingling, a change of environment, and illness, that have a negative impact on feed intake. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of feed flavors on feed intake, indicators of stress, and markers of the immune response for newly received feedlot cattle. Under the conditions of this study, the addition of flavoring agents showed some effects on the feeding pattern of newly arrived feedlot cattle, compatible with a positive hedonic response to the treatments. These effects, however, were limited to specific periods of time during the experiment and were not present when considering their performance over the whole 56-d feeding period. Furthermore, the addition of flavoring agents did not have a consistent effect on the concentration of inflammatory mediators, biomarkers of stress, or immune function. Future research should explore whether these or other flavoring agents, at different doses or used at different times, could cause biologically relevant effects to improve the resilience of calves during the feedlot receiving period.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Supplementing a blend of magnesium oxide to feedlot cattle: effects on ruminal, physiological, and productive responses.J Anim Sci. 2022 Jan 1;100(1):skab375. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab375. J Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 34951640 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of a molasses-based liquid supplement on gastrointestinal tract barrier function, inflammation, and performance of newly received feedlot cattle before and after a transport stress.J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skac295. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac295. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 36592757 Free PMC article.
-
Administering an appeasing substance to optimize performance and health responses in feedlot receiving cattle.J Anim Sci. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):skaa339. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa339. J Anim Sci. 2020. PMID: 33068399 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of supplemental Zn concentration and trace mineral source on immune function and associated biomarkers of immune status in weaned beef calves received into a feedlot.J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skac428. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac428. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 36588522 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of grain type and processing index on growth performance, carcass quality, feeding behavior, and stress response of feedlot steers.J Anim Sci. 2015 Jun;93(6):3091-100. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8680. J Anim Sci. 2015. PMID: 26115295 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Enzymic Activity, Metabolites, and Hematological Responses Changes of Clinical Healthy High-Risk Beef Calves During Their First 56-Days from Arrival.Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 8;15(2):133. doi: 10.3390/ani15020133. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39858133 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baumont, R. 1996. Palatability and feeding behaviour in ruminants. A review. Ann. Zootech. 45:385–400. doi:10.1051/animres:19960501 - DOI
-
- Boland, H. T., Scaglia G., Swecker W. S., and Burke N. C... 2008. Effects of alternate weaning methods on behavior, blood metabolites, and performance of beef calves. Prof. Anim. Sci. 24:539–551. doi:10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30903-7 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources