Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jul;26(7):1332-1345.
doi: 10.1111/codi.16983. Epub 2024 May 17.

Splenic flexure mobilization in left-sided colonic and rectal resections: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of factors associated with anastomotic leak and complications

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Splenic flexure mobilization in left-sided colonic and rectal resections: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of factors associated with anastomotic leak and complications

Sameh Hany Emile et al. Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is commonly performed during left-sided colon and rectal resections. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the outcomes of SFM in left-sided colon and rectal resections and the risk factors for complications and anastomotic leak (AL).

Method: This study was a PRISMA-compliant systematic review. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies that assessed the outcomes of sigmoid and rectal resections with or without SFM. The primary outcomes were AL and total complications, and the secondary outcomes were individual complications, operating time, conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS) and pathological and oncological outcomes.

Results: Nineteen studies including data on 81 116 patients (49.1% male) were reviewed. SFM was undertaken in 40.7% of patients. SFM was associated with a longer operating time (weighted mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 14.47-34.52, p < 0.0001) and higher odds of AL (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33, p = 0.002). Both groups had similar odds of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, (LOS), local recurrence, and overall survival. A secondary analysis of rectal cancer cases only showed similar outcomes for SFM and the control group.

Conclusions: SFM was associated with a longer operating time and higher odds of AL, yet a similar likelihood of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, LOS, local recurrence, and overall survival. These conclusions must be cautiously interpreted considering the numerous study limitations. SFM may have only been selectively undertaken in cases in which anastomotic tension was suspected. Therefore, the suboptimal anastomoses may have been the reason for SFM rather than the SFM being causative of the anastomotic insufficiencies.

Keywords: anastomotic leak; complications; left‐side colonic section; meta‐analysis; rectal resection; splenic flexure mobilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(3):233–254. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21772
    1. Osterman E, Hammarström K, Imam I, Osterlund E, Sjöblom T, Glimelius B. Recurrence risk after radical colorectal cancer surgery‐less than before, but how high is it? Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(11):3308. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113308
    1. Zarnescu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R. Updates of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(12):2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122382
    1. Fang AH, Chao W, Ecker M. Review of colonic anastomotic leakage and prevention methods. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):4061. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124061
    1. Williamson AJ, Alverdy JC. Influence of the microbiome on anastomotic leak. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021;34(6):439–446. https://doi.org/10.1055/s‐0041‐1735276

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources