Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Nov;34(11):6967-6979.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10783-8. Epub 2024 May 17.

Computed tomography versus ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Computed tomography versus ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guilherme Strieder de Oliveira et al. Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Some patients undergo both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) sequentially as part of the same evaluation for acute cholecystitis (AC). Our goal was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of US and CT in the diagnosis of AC.

Materials and methods: Databases were searched for relevant published studies through November 2023. The primary objective was to compare the head-to-head performance of US and CT using surgical intervention or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. For the secondary analysis, all individual US and CT studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were determined along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prevalence of imaging findings was also evaluated.

Results: Sixty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In the primary analysis of head-to-head studies (n = 5), CT had a pooled sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 78.4-88.2%) versus 79.0% (95% CI, 68.8-86.6%) of US (p = 0.44). The pooled specificity of CT was 94% (95% CI, 82.0-98.0%) versus 93.6% (95% CI, 79.4-98.2%) of US (p = 0.85). The concordance of positive or negative test between both modalities was 82.3% (95% CI, 72.1-89.4%). US and CT led to a positive change in management in only 4 to 8% of cases, respectively, when ordered sequentially after the other test.

Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of CT is comparable to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, with a high rate of concordance between the two modalities.

Clinical relevance statement: A subsequent US after a positive or negative CT for suspected acute cholecystitis may be unnecessary in most cases.

Key points: When there is clinical suspicion of acute cholecystitis, patients will often undergo both CT and US. CT has similar sensitivity and specificity compared to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The concordance rate between CT and US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is 82.3%.

Keywords: Acute cholecystitis; Computed tomography; Gallbladder; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Yarmish GM, Smith MP, Rosen MP et al (2014) ACR appropriateness criteria right upper quadrant pain. J Am College Radiol 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.017
    1. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2012) New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19:578–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0548-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ulreich S (1980) Acute cholecystitis. Arch Surgery 115:158. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380020026006 - DOI
    1. Freitas JE, Mirkes SH, Fink-Bennet DM, Bree RL (1982) Suspected acute cholecystitis comparison of hepatobiliary scintigraphy versus ultrasonography. Clin Nucl Med 7:364–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-198208000-00004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martínez A, Bona X, Velasco M, Martín J (1986) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Radiol 11:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02035103 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms