Computed tomography versus ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38758253
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10783-8
Computed tomography versus ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Some patients undergo both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) sequentially as part of the same evaluation for acute cholecystitis (AC). Our goal was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of US and CT in the diagnosis of AC.
Materials and methods: Databases were searched for relevant published studies through November 2023. The primary objective was to compare the head-to-head performance of US and CT using surgical intervention or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. For the secondary analysis, all individual US and CT studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were determined along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prevalence of imaging findings was also evaluated.
Results: Sixty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In the primary analysis of head-to-head studies (n = 5), CT had a pooled sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 78.4-88.2%) versus 79.0% (95% CI, 68.8-86.6%) of US (p = 0.44). The pooled specificity of CT was 94% (95% CI, 82.0-98.0%) versus 93.6% (95% CI, 79.4-98.2%) of US (p = 0.85). The concordance of positive or negative test between both modalities was 82.3% (95% CI, 72.1-89.4%). US and CT led to a positive change in management in only 4 to 8% of cases, respectively, when ordered sequentially after the other test.
Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of CT is comparable to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, with a high rate of concordance between the two modalities.
Clinical relevance statement: A subsequent US after a positive or negative CT for suspected acute cholecystitis may be unnecessary in most cases.
Key points: When there is clinical suspicion of acute cholecystitis, patients will often undergo both CT and US. CT has similar sensitivity and specificity compared to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The concordance rate between CT and US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is 82.3%.
Keywords: Acute cholecystitis; Computed tomography; Gallbladder; Ultrasound.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Similar articles
-
Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and CT in Evaluating Acute Cholecystitis.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):W92-W97. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18884. Epub 2018 Apr 27. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018. PMID: 29702020 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of the performance of ultrasound, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, CT and MRI in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Feb;49(2):384-398. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04059-w. Epub 2023 Nov 20. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024. PMID: 37982832
-
Computed Tomography Is More Sensitive than Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;16(5):509-12. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.102. Epub 2015 Sep 16. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015. PMID: 26375322
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 16;3:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub4. PMID: 33242342 Updated.
-
Test Characteristics of Emergency Medicine-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;83(3):235-246. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Ann Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 37855790
References
-
- Yarmish GM, Smith MP, Rosen MP et al (2014) ACR appropriateness criteria right upper quadrant pain. J Am College Radiol 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.11.017
-
- Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM et al (2012) New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19:578–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0548-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Ulreich S (1980) Acute cholecystitis. Arch Surgery 115:158. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380020026006 - DOI
-
- Freitas JE, Mirkes SH, Fink-Bennet DM, Bree RL (1982) Suspected acute cholecystitis comparison of hepatobiliary scintigraphy versus ultrasonography. Clin Nucl Med 7:364–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-198208000-00004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Martínez A, Bona X, Velasco M, Martín J (1986) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Radiol 11:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02035103 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous