Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;34(5):2701-2708.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03977-9. Epub 2024 May 17.

Mid-term clinical radiological results of the constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee revision

Affiliations

Mid-term clinical radiological results of the constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee revision

Iñigo Bidea et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study is to analyze the clinical-radiological outcomes of patients undergoing knee prosthesis revision surgery using constrained condylar prosthesis (LCCK; Zimmer-Biomet).

Material and methods: Retrospective study of 89 patients operated on between the years 2008 and 2020 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the WOMAC Index score and KOOS scales. Radiological results (radiolucent lines, osteolysis, and cortical hypertrophy) were evaluated by two independent observers. Implant survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: At the end of follow-up, a mean WOMAC Index score of 78.67 and KOOS score of 68.8 were obtained. Radiolucent lines (both non-progressive and progressive) were detected in 83.3% of the patients in the sample. Areas of osteolysis > 5 mm around the components were present in 6.75%. Cortical hypertrophy was seen around the femoral stem in 20.3% of cases, around the tibial stem in 20.3% and around both components in 6.76%. No statistically significant relationship was found between the presence of radiolucent lines, osteolysis or cortical hypertrophy with functional results. Implant survival was 88.1% at 13 years.

Conclusion: The present study shows high survival of LCCK prosthesis in revision surgery. The progressive radiolucencies, were associated with worst clinical outcome.

Keywords: Clinical; Constrained; Knee; Prosthesis; Radiological; Revision.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kurtz S, Ong L, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan H, Battista V, Leopold S (2005) Constraint in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Orthop Surg 13:515–524. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200512000-00004 - DOI
    1. McAuley JP, Engh GA (2003) Constraint in total knee arthroplasty: When and what? J Arthroplasty 18(3 Suppl 1):51–54. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2003.50103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim Y, Park J (2020) Long-term (Up to 21 years) survival of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:674–678 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilke BK, Wagner ER, Trousdale RT (2014) Long-term survival of semi-constrained total knee arthroplasty for revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 29(5):1005–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.025 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources