Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 1;46(6):778-785.
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001225. Epub 2024 May 14.

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Intravenous Busulfan in Thai Pediatrics Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Affiliations

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Intravenous Busulfan in Thai Pediatrics Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Apichaya Puangpetch et al. Ther Drug Monit. .

Abstract

Background: Conditioning bifunctional agent, busulfan, is commonly used on children before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Currently, at the Ramathibodi hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, initial dosing is calculated according to age and body surface area, and 7 samples per day are used for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This study aimed to identify the best strategies for individual dosages a priori from patient characteristics and a posteriori based on TDM.

Methods: The pharmacokinetic data set consisted of 2018 plasma concentrations measured in 135 Thai (n = 135) pediatric patients (median age = 8 years) and were analyzed using a population approach.

Results: Body weight, presence of malignant disease, and genetic polymorphism of Glutathione S-transferase Alpha-1 ( GSTA1 ) were predictors of clearance. The optimum sampling times for TDM concentration measurements were 0.25, 2, and 5 hours after a 3-hour infusion. This was sufficient to obtain a Bayesian estimate of clearance a posteriori. Simulations showed the poor performance of a priori formula-based dose calculations with 90% of patients demonstrating a 69%-151% exposure interval around the target. This interval shrank to 85%-124% if TDM was carried out only at day 1 and to 90%-116% with TDM at days 1 and 3.

Conclusions: This comprehensive study reinforces the interest of TDM in managing interindividual variability in busulfan exposure. Therapeutic drug monitoring can reliably be implemented from 3 samples using the Bayesian approach, preferably over 2 days. If using the latter is not possible, the formulas developed herein could present an alternative in Thai patients.

Keywords: busulfan; limited sampling strategy; model-informed precision dosing; pediatric; population pharmacokinetics; therapeutic drug monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lawson R, Staatz CE, Fraser CJ, et al. Review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous busulfan in paediatric patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021;60:17–51.
    1. McCune JS, Gooley T, Gibbs JP, et al. Busulfan concentration and graft rejection in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;30:167–173.
    1. Bartelink IH, Lalmohamed A, Van Reij EML, et al. Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3:e526–e536.
    1. Dix SP, Wingard JR, Mullins RE, et al. Association of busulfan area under the curve with veno-occlusive disease following BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996;17:225–230.
    1. Philippe M, Neely M, Rushing T, et al. Maximal concentration of intravenous busulfan as a determinant of veno-occlusive disease: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis in 293 hematopoietic stem cell transplanted children. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54:448–457.

LinkOut - more resources