Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024;32(S1):511-522.
doi: 10.3233/THC-248045.

Effects of Homologous instrument assisted mobilization (HIM) on ankle movement, gait-related muscle activation, and plantar pressure distribution in ankle dorsiflexion syndrome: A randomized single control trial

Seonmi Park, Joshua Sung H You
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Homologous instrument assisted mobilization (HIM) on ankle movement, gait-related muscle activation, and plantar pressure distribution in ankle dorsiflexion syndrome: A randomized single control trial

Seonmi Park et al. Technol Health Care. 2024.

Abstract

Background: While the limited ankle dorsiflexion syndrome (ADS) is common in neuro-musculoskeletal conditions, the instrument-assisted mobilization focused on the shortened gastro-soleus myofascial structure (IMI) rather than the homologous structure (both gastrosoleus and tibiliais anterior muscles, HIM).

Objective: We aimed to compare the immediate therapeutic effects between IMH and IMI treatment groups on the ankle dorsiflexion angle, muscle activation and foot pressure distribution during dynamic gait in ADS.

Methods: Neuromechanical tests including kinematics (ankle mobility), kinetics (center of pressure distribution), and electromyography were used to determine the immediate therapeutic effects between HIM and IMI treatment groups in 24 participants with ADS.

Results: The ankle joint angle analysis demonstrated a more improved active DF angle in the group who received HIM intervention when compared to the group who received IMI intervention. (11.26% and 3.58%, respectively) EMG analysis showed more decreased mean and peak TA activation amplitudes in the group who received HIM intervention (9.1% and 9%) when compared to the group who received IMI intervention (11.48% and 1.48%). Plantar pressure distribution analysis showed difference that the forefoot/area decreased in the group who received HIM intervention (8.1%), but rather increased in the group who received IMI intervention (14.3%).

Conclusions: Our neuromechanical results demonstrated promising positive effects on ankle joint mobility, muscle activation and foot pressure distribution during gait in ADS.

Keywords: Limited ankle dorsiflexion syndrome; electromyography; instrument-assisted mobilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Post-intervention questionnaire.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Dr. You STM®.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
IMI group intervention.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The lateral and medial GCM muscles were mobilized with the instrument assisted mobilization in the IMI group. The instrument assisted mobilization of the TA muscle was initially performed on the HIM group. And then the GCM muscles, both medial and lateral, are used.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Active ankle DF mobility data between HIM and IMI groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed at P< 0.05. A significant improvement in ankle DF angle was noted in the HIM intervention whereas no significant intervention-related change was observed.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Pre- and Post-test EMG amplitude data. Two-way ANOVA was performed at P< 0.05. A significant improvement in TA, EMG activation was noted in the HIM intervention whereas no significant intervention-related change was observed.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Adillón C, Gallegos M, Treviño S, Salvat I. Ankle joint dorsiflexion reference values in non-injured youth federated basketball players: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18): 11740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811740.. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grieve R, Byrne B, Clements C, Davies LJ, Durrant E, Kitchen O. The effects of foam rolling on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in healthy adults: A systematic literature review. J Bodywork Mov Ther. 2022; 30: 53–59.. - PubMed
    1. Farrag A, Elsayed W. Habitual Use of High-Heeled Shoes Affects Isokinetic Soleus Strength More Than Gastrocnemius in Healthy Young Females. Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37(9): 1008-16. doi: 10.1177/1071100716649172. Epub 2016 May 9. PMID: 27162223. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon JY, Hwang YI, An DH, Oh JS. Changes in kinetic, kinematic, and temporal parameters of walking in people with limited ankle dorsiflexion: pre-post application of modified mobilization with movement using talus glide taping. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2014; 37(5): 320-325. - PubMed
    1. Kwon Y, Shin G. Foot kinematics and leg muscle activation patterns are altered in those with limited ankle dorsiflexion range of motion during incline walking. Gait Posture. 2022; 92: 315-320. - PubMed

Publication types