Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep:272:114100.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114100. Epub 2024 May 15.

Associations of Abnormal Maternal Glucose Regulation in Pregnancy with Offspring Adiposity, Insulin Resistance, and Adipokine Markers During Childhood and Adolescence

Affiliations

Associations of Abnormal Maternal Glucose Regulation in Pregnancy with Offspring Adiposity, Insulin Resistance, and Adipokine Markers During Childhood and Adolescence

Sarah Cho et al. J Pediatr. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the associations of abnormal maternal glucose regulation in pregnancy with offspring adiposity, insulin resistance, adipokine, and inflammatory markers during childhood and adolescence.

Study design: Project Viva is a prospective prebirth cohort (n = 2128 live births) initiated from 1999 through 2002 in Eastern Massachusetts, US. During the second trimester of pregnancy, clinicians used 2-step oral glucose challenge testing to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus. In the offspring, we measured anthropometry, insulin resistance, adipokines, lipids, and inflammatory markers in mid-childhood (n = 1107), early adolescence (n = 1027), and mid-adolescence (n = 693). We used multivariable linear regression models and generalized estimating equations adjusted for child age and sex, and for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, parity, and smoking during pregnancy; we further adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index (BMI).

Results: In mid-adolescence (17.1 [0.8] years of age), offspring of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (n = 27) had a higher BMI z-score (β; 95% Cl; 0.41 SD; 0.00, 0.82), sum of skinfolds (8.15 mm; 2.48, 13.82), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (0.81 units; 0.13, 1.50), leptin z-score (0.40 SD; 0.01, 0.78), and leptin/adiponectin ratio z-score (0.51 SD; CI 0.09, 0.93) compared with offspring of mothers with normoglycemia (multivariable-adjusted models). The associations with BMI, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, and adiponectin seemed stronger in mid-adolescence compared with earlier time points. The associations were attenuated toward the null after adjustment for maternal prepregnancy BMI.

Conclusion: Exposure to gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with higher adiposity, insulin resistance, and altered adipokines in mid-adolescence. Our findings suggest that the peripubertal period could be a key time for the emergence of prenatally programmed metabolic abnormalities.

Keywords: Project Viva; fetal programming; gestational diabetes; life course epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. SC was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32, DK007028-46). SHL was supported by the American Diabetes Association (7-23-PDFT2DY-3) and Thomas O. Pyle Fellowship Award (Harvard Medical School Department of Population of Medicine). IA was supported by the American Heart Association (23CDA1050962); and the National Institutes of Health (5U54 AG062322-04, 1UG3 OD035533-01, 2R01 ES013744-16A1). This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01HD034568).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram for study participants
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. GDM exposure and offspring cardiometabolic outcomes at three time points (7y, 13y, and 18y).
For outcomes in which we observed an association in mid-adolescence, we tested potential interactions between GDM exposure and child age using GEE models. For outcomes with interaction p-values ≤ 0.20, we illustrated the predicted estimates and their 95% CI at three time points (7y, 13y, and 18y). We adjusted models for 1) child sex and age at outcome measurement; 2) model 1 + adjusted for maternal age, race and ethnicity, education, parity, smoking status during pregnancy; and 3) model 2 + adjusted for pre-pregnancy BMI. The grey shading (lighter to darker) represents the models adjusted for precision and confounding variables, and the shapes represent the three time points (7y, 13y, and 18y).

Similar articles

References

    1. Gregory E, Ely D. Trends and characteristics of Gestational Diabetes: United States, 2016–2021. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2022;71. - PubMed
    1. Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis | The BMJ [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1361 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B, Donovan L. Benefits and harms of treating gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:123–9. - PubMed
    1. Hockett CW, Harrall KK, Glueck DH, Dabelea DM. Exposure to gestational diabetes and BMI trajectories through adolescence: Exploring Perinatal Outcomes in Children study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;278. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Lindsay RS, Pettitt DJ, Imperatore G, Gabir MM, et al. Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: a study of discordant sibships. Diabetes. 2000;49:2208–11. - PubMed