Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 May 16;14(5):e079540.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079540.

Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations

Affiliations
Observational Study

Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations

Ester A Rake et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Patients' preferences, values and contexts are important elements of the shared decision-making (SDM) process. We captured those elements into the concept of 'personal perspective elicitation' (PPE), which reflects the need to elicit patients' preferences, values and contexts in patient-clinician conversations. We defined PPE as: 'the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or contexts potentially relevant to decision-making'. Our goal was to operationalise the concept of PPE through the evaluation of preferences, values and contexts and explore how PPE occurs in clinical encounters.

Design: Cross-sectional study: observational coding based on a novel coding scheme of audio-recorded outpatient clinical encounters where encounter patient decision aids were applied.

Setting: We audio-recorded patient-clinician interactions at three Dutch outpatient clinics. PPE was analysed using a novel observational coding scheme, distinguishing preferences, contexts and four Armstrong taxonomy value types (global, decisional, external and situational). We measured SDM using the Observer OPTION5.

Participants: Twenty patients who suffered from psoriasis or ovarian cysts; four clinicians.

Results: We included 20 audio-recordings. The mean Observer OPTION5 score was 57.5 (SD:10.1). The audio-recordings gave a rich illustration of preferences, values and contexts that were discussed in the patient-clinician interactions. Examples of identified global values: appearance, beliefs, personality traits. Decisional values were related to the process of decision-making. External values related to asking advice from for example, the clinician or significant others. An identified situational value: a new job ahead. Contexts related to how the illness impacted the life (eg, sexuality, family, sports, work life) of patients.

Conclusions: The operationalisation of PPE, an important aspect of SDM, explores which preferences, values and contexts were discussed during patient-clinician interactions where an ePDA was used. The coding scheme appeared feasible to apply but needs further refinement.

Keywords: Decision Making; Patient-Centered Care; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: GE has edited and published books that provide royalties: Shared Decision Making (Oxford University Press) and Groups (Radcliffe Press). Glyn Elwyn’s academic interests are focused on shared decision-making and coproduction. He owns copyright in measures of shared decision-making (collaboRATE) and care integration (integRATE), a measure of experience of care in serious illness (consideRATE), a measure of goal setting coopeRATE, a measure of clinician willingness to do shared decision-making (incorpoRATE), an observer measures of shared decision-making (Observer OPTION-5 and Observer OPTION-12). He is the Founder and Director of &think LLC which owns the registered trademark for Option GridsTM patient decision aids; Founder, Director of SHARPNETWORK LLC, a provider of online training for shared decision-making, consultant to EBSCO Health and Chief Clinical Research Scientist to abridge AI Inc. JAMK is Special Envoy for Appropriate Care (Ministry of Health, the Netherlands). DD is a member of the programme committee of ZonMw. ZonMw programmes and funds research and innovation in health, healthcare and well-being, encourages the use of this knowledge and highlights knowledge needs. JWMA, Guus Brand, Marjan Meinders and Ester Rake: none declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the observational coding process for elicitations (PPE) and disclosures (PPD) of personal perspectives. Blue boxes depict clinician’s utterances, purple boxes depict patient’s utterances. PPE-C, personal perspective elicitation (PPE) by clinician; PPE-PR, PPE patient’s response; PPE-CR, PPE clinician’s response; PPD-P, personal perspective disclosure—patient; PPD-CR, personal perspective disclosure—clinician’s response.

Similar articles

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC) National Academies Press (US); 2001. - PubMed
    1. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, et al. . Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. 1st edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
    1. Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, et al. . A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ 2017;359:j4891. 10.1136/bmj.j4891 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiner SJ. Contextualizing care: an essential and measurable clinical competency. Patient Educ Couns 2022;105:594–8. 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ting HH, Brito JP, Montori VM. Shared decision making: science and action. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014;7:323–7. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000288 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types