Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations
- PMID: 38760032
- PMCID: PMC11103202
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079540
Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations
Abstract
Objectives: Patients' preferences, values and contexts are important elements of the shared decision-making (SDM) process. We captured those elements into the concept of 'personal perspective elicitation' (PPE), which reflects the need to elicit patients' preferences, values and contexts in patient-clinician conversations. We defined PPE as: 'the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or contexts potentially relevant to decision-making'. Our goal was to operationalise the concept of PPE through the evaluation of preferences, values and contexts and explore how PPE occurs in clinical encounters.
Design: Cross-sectional study: observational coding based on a novel coding scheme of audio-recorded outpatient clinical encounters where encounter patient decision aids were applied.
Setting: We audio-recorded patient-clinician interactions at three Dutch outpatient clinics. PPE was analysed using a novel observational coding scheme, distinguishing preferences, contexts and four Armstrong taxonomy value types (global, decisional, external and situational). We measured SDM using the Observer OPTION5.
Participants: Twenty patients who suffered from psoriasis or ovarian cysts; four clinicians.
Results: We included 20 audio-recordings. The mean Observer OPTION5 score was 57.5 (SD:10.1). The audio-recordings gave a rich illustration of preferences, values and contexts that were discussed in the patient-clinician interactions. Examples of identified global values: appearance, beliefs, personality traits. Decisional values were related to the process of decision-making. External values related to asking advice from for example, the clinician or significant others. An identified situational value: a new job ahead. Contexts related to how the illness impacted the life (eg, sexuality, family, sports, work life) of patients.
Conclusions: The operationalisation of PPE, an important aspect of SDM, explores which preferences, values and contexts were discussed during patient-clinician interactions where an ePDA was used. The coding scheme appeared feasible to apply but needs further refinement.
Keywords: Decision Making; Patient-Centered Care; Quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: GE has edited and published books that provide royalties: Shared Decision Making (Oxford University Press) and Groups (Radcliffe Press). Glyn Elwyn’s academic interests are focused on shared decision-making and coproduction. He owns copyright in measures of shared decision-making (collaboRATE) and care integration (integRATE), a measure of experience of care in serious illness (consideRATE), a measure of goal setting coopeRATE, a measure of clinician willingness to do shared decision-making (incorpoRATE), an observer measures of shared decision-making (Observer OPTION-5 and Observer OPTION-12). He is the Founder and Director of &think LLC which owns the registered trademark for Option GridsTM patient decision aids; Founder, Director of SHARPNETWORK LLC, a provider of online training for shared decision-making, consultant to EBSCO Health and Chief Clinical Research Scientist to abridge AI Inc. JAMK is Special Envoy for Appropriate Care (Ministry of Health, the Netherlands). DD is a member of the programme committee of ZonMw. ZonMw programmes and funds research and innovation in health, healthcare and well-being, encourages the use of this knowledge and highlights knowledge needs. JWMA, Guus Brand, Marjan Meinders and Ester Rake: none declared.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Shared Decision Making in Health Care Visits for CKD: Patients' Decisional Role Preferences and Experiences.Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Dec;82(6):677-686. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Jul 28. Am J Kidney Dis. 2023. PMID: 37516297
-
Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review.Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Sep;105(9):2860-2870. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 16. Patient Educ Couns. 2022. PMID: 35659466
-
Shared decision making in routine clinical care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an assessment of audio-recorded consultations.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):170-175. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216137. Epub 2019 Oct 29. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 31662320
-
Importance of quality-of-life priorities and preferences surrounding treatment decision making in patients with cancer and oncology clinicians.Cancer. 2020 Aug 1;126(15):3534-3541. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32961. Epub 2020 May 19. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32426870
-
Management reasoning and patient-clinician interactions: Insights from shared decision-making and simulated outpatient encounters.Med Teach. 2023 Sep;45(9):1025-1037. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2170776. Epub 2023 Feb 10. Med Teach. 2023. PMID: 36763491 Review.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC) National Academies Press (US); 2001. - PubMed
-
- Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, et al. . Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. 1st edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical