Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 17;23(1):100.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02192-6.

Intersectionality analysis of young people's experiences and perceptions of discrimination in primary health centers in Ebonyi State, Southeast Nigeria

Chibuike Innocent Agu  1   2 , Ozioma Nwankpa  1 , Chinazom N Ekwueme  1   3 , Ifunanya Clara Agu  4 , Chinyere Ojiugo Mbachu  1   3 , Nkoli Ezumah  1 , Obinna Onwujekwe  1   5
Affiliations

Intersectionality analysis of young people's experiences and perceptions of discrimination in primary health centers in Ebonyi State, Southeast Nigeria

Chibuike Innocent Agu et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: Young people (aged 10 to 24 years) in sub-Saharan Africa bear a huge and disproportionate burden of poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes due to inequalities and discrimination in accessing sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS). This study assessed the experiences and perceptions of discrimination among young people seeking SRH services in Primary Health Centers (PHCs) using an intersectionality lens.

Methods: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was undertaken in six local government areas (LGAs) in Ebonyi State, southeast Nigeria. The LGAs comprise both urban and rural locations. The study population for the quantitative survey consisted of 1025 randomly selected young boys and girls aged 15-24 years. Eleven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with the young people. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed for quantitative data, while thematic analysis was performed for the qualitative data, using NVivo.

Results: A total of 16.68% participants in the survey reported that young girls/women were treated badly/unfairly compared to young boys/men when seeking SRH services in PHCs; 15.22% reported that young clients get treated badly/unfairly from adults; and 12.49% reported that young clients with poor economic status were treated unfairly. Respondents also reported that young clients with disability (12.12%), and those who are poorly educated or uneducated (10.63%) are treated badly by healthcare providers when they access SRH services. Young people in urban areas were about 7 times more likely to believe that girls/young women are treated badly than boys/young men when seeking SRH services in PHCs compared to those who live in rural areas (p < 0.001). Among the young girls/women, residing in urban areas, being poor and in school increased the likelihood of getting treated badly/unfairly when receiving SRH services by 4 times (p < 0.001). The qualitative results revealed that health workers were generally harsh to young people seeking SRH services and the level of harshness or unfriendliness of the health workers varied depending on the young person's social identity.

Conclusion: There are varieties of intersecting factors that contribute to the discrimination of young clients in PHCs. This underscores the urgent need to prioritize intersectional perspectives in the design and implementation of interventions that will improve access and use of SRH services by young people.

Keywords: Adolescents and young people; Discrimination; Experiences; Intersectionality; Perception; Primary health centers; SRH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An intersectionality framework, adapted from the synergies of oppression [32]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of young people’s experiences of discrimination from the qualitative findings
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Neal S, Matthews Z, Frost M, Fogstad H, Camacho AV, Laski L. Childbearing in adolescents aged 12–15 years in low resource countries: a neglected issue. New estimates from demographic and household surveys in 42 countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1114–1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01467.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lois Levine M. Educating young people about sexual and reproductive health. Contemporary OB/GYN. 2023. Available from: https://www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/educating-young-people-about-sexu.... Cited 2023 Jun 20.
    1. Ajayi AI, Otukpa EO, Mwoka M, Kabiru CW, Ushie BA. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of substantive focus, research volume, geographic distribution and Africa-led inquiry. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:1–10. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004129. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santhya K, Jejeebhoy S. Sexual and reproductive health and rights of adolescent girls: evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Glob Public Health. 2015;10:189–221. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.986169. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah I, Åhman E. Unsafe abortion differentials in 2008 by age and developing country region: high burden among young women. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20:169–173. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39598-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources