Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;271(8):4972-4981.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12392-3. Epub 2024 May 18.

Validation of a risk score to differentiate autoimmune and viral encephalitis: a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark

Affiliations

Validation of a risk score to differentiate autoimmune and viral encephalitis: a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark

Lasse Fjordside et al. J Neurol. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: A score to differentiate autoimmune (AE) and viral encephalitis (VE) early upon admission has recently been developed but needed external validation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the score in a larger and more diagnostically diverse patient cohort.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide and population-based cohort study including all adults with encephalitis of definite viral (2015-2022) or autoimmune aetiology (2009-2022) in Denmark. Variables included in the score-model were extracted from patient records and individual risk scores were assessed. The performance of the score was assessed by receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses and calculation of the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: A total of 496 patients with encephalitis [AE n = 90, VE n = 287 and presumed infectious encephalitis (PIE) n = 119] were included in the study. The score was highly accurate in predicting cases of AE reaching an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.97). Having a score ≥ 3 predicted AE with a PPV of 87% and an NPV of 91%. The risk score was found to perform well across aetiological subgroups and applied to the PIE cohort resulted in an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.93).

Conclusion: The excellent performance of the score as reported in the development study was confirmed in this significantly larger and more diverse cohort of patients with encephalitis in Denmark. These results should prompt further prospective testing with wider inclusion criteria.

Keywords: Autoimmune encephalitis; Encephalitis; Risk score; Validation; Viral encephalitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AML reports speakers’ honorarium/travel grants/advisory board activity and unrestricted grant from Gilead, speakers honorarium/travel grants from GSK, and speaker’s honorarium/advisory board activity from Pfizer outside this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the inclusion process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bar charts comparing median score values and interquartile ranges of the AE and VE cohorts. A Compares the median score values between the AE and the VE cohort and B depicts the median score values by aetiological subgroups of the AE (light gray) and VE (dark gray), with fill patterns indicating individual diagnosis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) for the performance of the risk score to differentiate the AE from the VE cohort (A) and ROC curves for the comparison of the score performance for each of the different viral aetiological subgroups (B) as well as for each of the different autoimmune aetiological subgroups (C)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Bar chart comparing the score distribution in the AE and the VE cohorts by accumulated score values A and score elements B
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Bar chart comparing the score distribution by score elements for each of the diagnostic subgroups. HSV1 herpes simplex virus 1, VZV varicella zoster virus, TBE tick-borne encephalitis, HSV2 herpes simplex virus 2, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, NMDAR N-methyl-d-aspartate-receptor, LGI1 leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1, GABA-B γ-aminobutyric acid type B, AMPAR alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor, CCI

Similar articles

References

    1. Balu R, Mccracken L, Lancaster E, Graus F, Dalmau J, Titulaer MJ (2019) A score that predicts 1-year functional status in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurology 92(3):E244–E252. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006783 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006783 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broadley J et al (2019) Prognosticating autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic review. J Autoimmun 96:24–34. 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.014 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thakur KT et al (2013) Predictors of outcome in acute encephalitis. Neurology 81(9):793–800. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a2cc6d 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a2cc6d - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flanagan EP et al (2023) Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis in adults. JAMA Neurol 80(1):30–39. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4251 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4251 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Granerod J, Tam CC, Crowcroft NS, Davies NWS, Borchert M, Thomas SL (2010) Challenge of the unknown: a systematic review of acute encephalitis in non-outbreak situations. Neurology 75(10):924–932. 10.1212/WNL.0B013E3181F11D65 10.1212/WNL.0B013E3181F11D65 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources