Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study
- PMID: 38761198
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03982-y
Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study
Abstract
Purpose: Bacterial biofilms create a challenge in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and failure to eradicate biofilms is often implicated in the high rates of recurrence. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of a novel nanoparticle ultrasonication technology on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm eradication compared to commonly used orthopedic irrigation solutions.
Methods: Twenty-four sterile, titanium alloy discs were inoculated with a standardized concentration of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and cultured for seven days to allow for biofilm formation. Discs were then treated with either ultrasonicated nanoparticle therapy or irrigation with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine or normal saline. The remaining bacteria on each surface was subsequently plated for colony-forming units of S. aureus. Bacterial eradication was reported as a decrease in CFUs relative to the control group. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare between groups.
Results: Treatment with ultrasonicated nanoparticles resulted in a significant mean decrease in CFUs of 99.3% compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Irrigation with povidone-iodine also resulted in a significant 77.5% reduction in CFUs compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Comparisons between ultrasonicated nanoparticles and povidone-iodine demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in bacterial CFUs in the nanoparticle group (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Ultrasonicated nanoparticle were superior to commonly used bactericidal irrigation solutions in the eradication of S. aureus from a titanium surface. Future clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this ultrsonication technology in the treatment of PJI.
Keywords: Biofilms; Infection; New technology; Periprosthetic joint infection.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Not All Antiseptic Solutions Are Equivalent in Removing Biofilm: A Comparison Across Different Orthopaedic Surfaces.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Jan 15;107(2):127-133. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01118. Epub 2024 Nov 22. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025. PMID: 39812721 Free PMC article.
-
Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate are equally effective in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm grown on a titanium surface: an in-vitro analysis.J Hosp Infect. 2025 Jan;155:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.11.012. Epub 2024 Nov 22. J Hosp Infect. 2025. PMID: 39579939
-
Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm.Bone Joint J. 2021 May;103-B(5):908-915. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1245.R2. Bone Joint J. 2021. PMID: 33934664
-
A Meta-analysis of Breast Implant Irrigation Solutions' Effect on Infection and Capsular Contracture Frequencies.Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Apr 1;94(4S Suppl 2):S315-S321. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004208. Epub 2024 Dec 31. Ann Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 40167092
-
The Use of Antiseptic Solutions in the Prevention and Management of Penile Prosthesis Infections: A Review of the Cytotoxic and Microbiological Effects of Common Irrigation Solutions.J Sex Med. 2019 Jun;16(6):781-790. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.271. J Sex Med. 2019. PMID: 31146926 Review.
References
-
- Ahmed SS, Haddad FS (2019) Prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint Res 8:570–572. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.812.BJR-2019-0340 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kelmer G, Stone AH, Turcotte J, King PJ (2021) Reasons for revision: primary total hip arthroplasty mechanisms of failure. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29:78–87. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00860 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Natsuhara KM, Shelton TJ, Meehan JP, Lum ZC (2019) Mortality during total hip periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 34:S337–S342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.024 - DOI
-
- Shichman I, Sobba W, Beaton G, Polisetty T, Nguyen HB, Dipane MV et al (2023) The effect of prosthetic joint infection on work status and quality of life: a multicenter. Int Study J Arthroplast 38:2685-2690.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.015 - DOI
-
- Leung F, Richards CJ, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2011) Two-stage total hip arthroplasty: how often does it control methicillin-resistant infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1725-6 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources