Similar articles

• Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography.

  Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C, Benali N, van Rysselberghe M, Barlow P, Rozenberg S. Regnard C, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;23(3):289-92. doi: 10.1002/uog.999. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15027020
• [Dehiscence of the uterine scar after three previous caesarean sections].

  Stein W, Felke B, Schulze U, Emons G. Stein W, et al. Ultraschall Med. 2010 Aug;31(4):410-1. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109167. Epub 2009 Jun 18. Ultraschall Med. 2010. PMID: 19544234 German. No abstract available.
• Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.

  Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, Yazbek J, Lee C, Gonzalez J, Jurkovic D. Ofili-Yebovi D, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;31(1):72-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5200. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18061960
• Cesarean scar pregnancy: a practical overview and our series of combined double step procedure management.

  Damiani GR, Vimercati A, DI Gennaro D, Vitagliano A, Giampaolino P, Malvasi A, Perrone AM, Pellegrino A, Dellino M, Cicinelli E. Damiani GR, et al. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;76(5):416-422. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.23.05291-0. Epub 2023 Jun 16. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 37326353 Review.
• Obesity and the challenges of caesarean delivery: prevention and management of wound complications.

  Ayres-de-Campos D. Ayres-de-Campos D. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Apr;29(3):406-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015. PMID: 25457856 Review.