Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug;22(8):2115-2128.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 May 16.

Application of genetic testing for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

Affiliations
Review

Application of genetic testing for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

Omid Seidizadeh et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder, with an estimated symptomatic prevalence of 1 per 1000 in the general population. VWD is characterized by defects in the quantity, quality, or multimeric structure of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a glycoprotein being hemostatically essential in circulation. VWD is classified into 3 principal types: low VWF/type 1 with partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 with virtual absence of VWF, and type 2 with functional abnormalities of VWF, being classified as 2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N. A new VWD type has been officially recognized by the ISTH SSC on von Willebrand factor which has also been discussed by the joint ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH 2021 guidelines (ie, type 1C), indicating patients with quantitative deficiency due to an enhanced VWF clearance. With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the process of genetic diagnosis has substantially changed and improved accuracy. Therefore, nowadays, patients with type 3 and severe type 1 VWD can benefit from genetic testing as much as type 2 VWD. Specifically, genetic testing can be used to confirm or differentiate a VWD diagnosis, as well as to provide genetic counseling. The focus of this manuscript is to discuss the current knowledge on VWD molecular pathophysiology and the application of genetic testing for VWD diagnosis.

Keywords: NGS; VWD; VWF; genetic testing; molecular diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interests F.P. serves on the advisory committee of CSL-Behring, BioMarin, Roche, Sanofi, and Sobi and participated in educational meetings/symposia of Takeda/Spark. D.L. reports research support from BioMarin, CSL-Behring, and Sanofi and participates in an advisory role for BioMarin, CSL-Behring, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. The other authors state that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Structure of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene, pseudogene, and protein precursor. A schematic representation of the pre-pro-VWF is presented along with its homologous repeated domain. Disulfide bonds between subunits that are involved in dimerization and multimerization are shown along with ligand binding sites. The arrows indicate the major location of mutations that cause various type 2 von Willebrand disease. Recessive type 2 von Willebrand disease variants are shown by an asterisk (*). ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 13; FVIII, factor VIII; GP, glycoprotein; SP, signal peptide.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Type of von Willebrand factor genetic variants stratified for each von Willebrand disease type. The majority of types 1, 2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N variants reported so far are missense, differently from type 3 von Willebrand disease with only 25% missense variants.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
von Willebrand factor (VWF) domain distribution and the type of von Willebrand disease (VWD) for all the reported variants so far. Variants of VWD types 1 and 3 were found all over the VWF domains, mainly propeptide VWF (D1-D2 domain), D′-D3, D4, and C1-C6. In type 2A, 45% of variants were in the A2 domain, and the rest were in the D1-D2 (15%), D′-D3 (20%), A1 (14%), and cystine-knot (CK) domain (6%). All variants of type 2B were in the A1 domain (85%) or D3-A1 junction (15%). Type 2M variants were located mostly in the A1 (75%) but also in the A3 domains (25%). A majority of type 2N variants were in the D′-D3 (89%), and the rest, 11%, were in the D2 domain. SP, signal peptide.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Assessment of pathogenicity and interpretation of novel variants. In the case of a novel variant, large population-based databases such as gnomAD can be used to filter out common variants. Next, the effect of variants at the protein level can be assisted using in silico tools. The study of family members is useful in understanding the pathogenicity of genetic variants and their inheritance patterns. The true effect of variants on protein production and function can be determined by cell and animal-based models. The final step is to confirm the variant influence in the studied proband using phenotypic assays to classify variant.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Genetic counseling for von Willebrand disease (VWD). VWD occurs among men and women equally. Autosomal–dominant VWD types: type 1, 2A, 2B, and 2M; autosomal recessive VWD types: type 2N and type 3. Of note, a rare type 2A phenotype, 2A(IIC), is also inherited as autosomal recessive. An autosomal-dominant VWD only requires one copy of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene to be altered for the condition to present. The chance of a child inheriting the variant and developing the VWD from an affected parent is 1 in 2 (50%). In autosomal recessive conditions, both copies of the VWF gene are required to be altered for the condition to be present. The chance of a child inheriting 2 copies of the altered gene and developing VWD when both parents are carriers is 1 in 4 (25%). Chr, chromosome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rodeghiero F, Castaman G, Dini E. Epidemiological investigation of the prevalence of von Willebrand’s disease. Blood. 1987;69:454–9. - PubMed
    1. Werner EJ, Broxson EH, Tucker EL, Giroux DS, Shults J, Abshire TC. Prevalence of von Willebrand disease in children: a multiethnic study. J Pediatr. 1993;123:893–8. - PubMed
    1. Bowman M, Hopman W, Rapson D, Lillicrap D, James P. The prevalence of symptomatic von Willebrand disease in primary care practice. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:213–6. - PubMed
    1. Seidizadeh O, Cairo A, Baronciani L, Valenti L, Peyvandi F. Population-based prevalence and mutational landscape of von Willebrand disease using large-scale genetic databases. NPJ Genom Med. 2023;8:31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadler JE, Budde U, Eikenboom JC, Favaloro EJ, Hill FG, Holmberg L, Ingerslev J, Lee CA, Lillicrap D, Mannucci PM, Mazurier C, Meyer D, Nichols WL, Nishino M, Peake IR, Rodeghiero F, Schneppenheim R, Ruggeri ZM, Srivastava A, Montgomery RR, et al. Update on the pathophysiology and classification of von Willebrand disease: a report of the Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:2103–14. - PubMed

Substances