Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 17;12(2):e002729.
doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-002729.

Harnessing innovation to help meet the needs of elders: field testing an electronic tool to streamline geriatric assessments across healthcare settings

Affiliations

Harnessing innovation to help meet the needs of elders: field testing an electronic tool to streamline geriatric assessments across healthcare settings

Limor Adler et al. Fam Med Community Health. .

Abstract

Background: As populations age globally, effectively managing geriatric health poses challenges for primary care. Comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) aim to address these challenges through multidisciplinary screening and coordinated care planning. However, most CGA tools and workflows have not been optimised for routine primary care delivery.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a computerised CGA tool, called the Golden Age Visit, implemented in primary care in Israel.

Methods: This study employed a quasiexperimental mixed-methods design to evaluate outcomes associated with the Golden Age electronic health assessment tool. Quantitative analysis used electronic medical records data from Maccabi Healthcare Services, the second largest health management organisation (HMO) in Israel. Patients aged 75 and older were included in analyses from January 2017 to December 2019 and January 2021 to December 2022. For patients, data were also collected on controls who did not participate in the Golden Age Visit programme during the same time period, to allow for comparison of outcomes. For physicians, qualitative data were collected via surveys and interviews with primary care physicians who used the Golden Age Visit SMARTEST e-assessment tool.

Results: A total of 9022 community-dwelling adults aged 75 and older were included in the study: 1421 patients received a Golden Age Visit CGA (intervention group), and 7601 patients did not receive the assessment (control group). After CGAs, diagnosis rates increased significantly for neuropsychiatric conditions and falls. Referrals to physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics and geriatric outpatient clinics also rose substantially. However, no differences were found in rates of hip fracture or relocation to long-term care between groups. Surveys among physicians (n=151) found high satisfaction with the programme.

Conclusion: Implementation of a large-scale primary care CGA programme was associated with improved diagnosis and management of geriatric conditions. Physicians were also satisfied, suggesting good uptake and feasibility within usual care. Further high-quality studies are still needed but these results provide real-world support for proactively addressing geriatric health needs through structured screening models.

Keywords: community medicine; family medicine; geriatrics; primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The process of developing the SMARTEST for Golden Age Visit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary care physicians' satisfaction and perceived value of the Golden Age Visit SMARTEST decision support features.

Similar articles

References

    1. World population prospects - focus on - demographic fact sheets - Ined - Institut national D’Études Démographiques. 2022. Available: https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/demographic-facts-she...
    1. Hansen TK, Pedersen LH, Shahla S, et al. . Effects of a new early municipality-based versus a geriatric team-based transitional care intervention on readmission and mortality among frail older patients – a randomised controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2021;97:104511. 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104511 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrard JW, Cox NJ, Dodds RM, et al. . Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020;32:197–205. 10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellis G, Whitehead MA, Robinson D, et al. . Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d6553. 10.1136/bmj.d6553 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veronese N, Custodero C, Demurtas J, et al. . Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older people: an umbrella review of health outcomes. 51. Age and Ageing. Oxford University Press, 2022. - PubMed