Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 18;22(1):471.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05291-8.

Dynamic radiological features predict pathological response after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Dynamic radiological features predict pathological response after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Yuli Ruan et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) plus esophagectomy has emerged as a promising treatment option for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a key indicator associated with great efficacy and overall survival (OS). However, there are insufficient indicators for the reliable assessment of pCR.

Methods: 192 patients with LA-ESCC treated with NICT from December 2019 to October 2023 were recruited. According to pCR status, patients were categorized into pCR group (22.92%) and non-pCR group (77.08%). Radiological features of pretreatment and preoperative CT images were extracted. Logistic and COX regressions were trained to predict pathological response and prognosis, respectively.

Results: Four of the selected radiological features were combined to construct an ESCC preoperative imaging score (ECPI-Score). Logistic models revealed independent associations of ECPI-Score and vascular sign with pCR, with AUC of 0.918 in the training set and 0.862 in the validation set, respectively. After grouping by ECPI-Score, a higher proportion of pCR was observed among the high-ECPI group and negative vascular sign. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that recurrence-free survival (RFS) with negative vascular sign was significantly better than those with positive (P = 0.038), but not for OS (P = 0.310).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates dynamic radiological features are independent predictors of pCR for LA-ESCC treated with NICT. It will guide clinicians to make accurate treatment plans.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCC201908A03.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Esophageal cancer; Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade; Pathological complete response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow diagram of selection esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. A Enrollment of patients; B selection of factors; C data validation. CT computed tomography, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiological features before and after treatment for esophageal cancer. A Vascular sign; B tumor length; C tumor thickness; D tumor area
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Construction and validation of a scoring system for LA-ESCC. A Radiographic scoring system; B ROC curve for scoring system; C correlation heatmap of individual metrics and pCR in LA-ESCC
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The representative cases of vascular sign and radiological features and pathological tissue in two patients
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The proportion of each indicator in radiological features A pCR vs. non-pCR; B nerve invasion vs. vascular invasion; C ypT stages vs. ypN stages
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Survival analysis based on different indicators in LA-ESCC patients. A RFS: pCR vs. non-pCR; B OS: pCR vs. non-pCR; C RFS: score < 2 vs. score ≥ 2; D OS: score < 2 vs. score ≥ 2; E RFS: vascular sign (−) vs. vascular sign (+); F OS: vascular sign (−) vs. vascular sign (+)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li J, Ma S. History and current situation of neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12(17):2293–2299. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14069. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yan X, Duan H, Ni Y, Zhou Y, Wang X, Qi H, et al. Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: a prospective, single-arm, phase II study (TD-NICE) Int J Surg. 2022;103:106680. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106680. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun JM, Shen L, Shah MA, Enzinger P, Adenis A, Doi T, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):759–771. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doki Y, Ajani JA, Kato K, Xu J, Wyrwicz L, Motoyama S, et al. Nivolumab combination therapy in advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(5):449–462. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111380. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luo H, Lu J, Bai Y, Mao T, Wang J, Fan Q, et al. Effect of camrelizumab vs placebo added to chemotherapy on survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the ESCORT-1st randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(10):916–925. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12836. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data