Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 18;15(1):4234.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48626-1.

Genome-scale analysis of interactions between genetic perturbations and natural variation

Affiliations

Genome-scale analysis of interactions between genetic perturbations and natural variation

Joseph J Hale et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Interactions between genetic perturbations and segregating loci can cause perturbations to show different phenotypic effects across genetically distinct individuals. To study these interactions on a genome scale in many individuals, we used combinatorial DNA barcode sequencing to measure the fitness effects of 8046 CRISPRi perturbations targeting 1721 distinct genes in 169 yeast cross progeny (or segregants). We identified 460 genes whose perturbation has different effects across segregants. Several factors caused perturbations to show variable effects, including baseline segregant fitness, the mean effect of a perturbation across segregants, and interacting loci. We mapped 234 interacting loci and found four hub loci that interact with many different perturbations. Perturbations that interact with a given hub exhibit similar epistatic relationships with the hub and show enrichment for cellular processes that may mediate these interactions. These results suggest that an individual's response to perturbations is shaped by a network of perturbation-locus interactions that cannot be measured by approaches that examine perturbations or natural variation alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Generating and phenotyping a panel of double-barcoded segregants carrying CRISPRi perturbations.
a Segregant-specific barcodes were first integrated into the genomic landing pad, followed by barcoded CRISPRi constructs. This resulted in a double barcode within each cell that uniquely identified its specific segregant-gRNA combination. b Pooled fitness assays were performed. Fitnesses were estimated using double barcode amplicon sequencing data from multiple time points. Density plots showing the fitness of each double-barcode lineage across either ATC1 and ATC2 (c) or CON and ATC1 (d). ATC1 and ATC2 are two replicate experimental fitness assays where gRNAs were induced. CON is the control assay where gRNAs were not induced. e Average fitness values of 74 gRNAs that directly overlap polymorphisms between BY and 3S, across both experimental and control assays. 3S alleles at binding sites have imperfect matches with gRNAs. Boxes indicate interquartile ranges (IQRs), with medians shown by horizontal lines. Whiskers indicate a distance of 1.5 IQRs from the upper or lower quartile, up to the minimum or maximum values. Asterisks and ‘n.s.’ respectively indicate p < 1 × 10−5 and >0.05 via two-sided t test (p value for ATC match vs ATC mismatch = 9.3 × 10−09, p value for CON match vs CON mismatch = 0.837, p value for ATC vs CON = 3.0 × 10−24). f Distribution of all mean gRNA effects as calculated by the mixed effects linear model. The estimated null distribution is shown by the dashed line. The threshold used for calling efficacious gRNAs is three standard deviations below the mean of this null distribution (vertical red line). The gRNA effect here is a mean calculated by averaging across all segregants carrying the gRNA. Density plots showing the average fitness values for each gRNA across either ATC1 and ATC2 (g) or CON and ATC1 (h). For each gRNA, replicate barcodes within each genotype were averaged before taking the mean across all genotypes. In all density plots, the data points–double barcode lineages in (c) and (d) and gRNAs in (g) and (h)–are organized in bins to generate heatmaps.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Calculating deviation values for all segregant-gRNA combinations.
a Schematic representation of how deviation values are calculated from fitness. b Heatmap of all deviation values. Segregants are shown along the y-axis, ordered by mean fitness, and gRNAs are shown along the x-axis, ordered by mean effect size. Missing combinations are shown in gray. Only rows and columns with 30% or less missing data are shown. c Relationship between baseline segregant fitness and deviation values for that genotype (n = 170, including 169 segregants and the BY parent). Dots indicate average deviation value, and lines indicate 2 standard deviations. The 95% bootstrap confidence interval for the R2 value of 0.149 was 0.145–0.152. d Relationship between mean gRNA effect and the standard deviation (SD) of deviation values for that gRNA, with the best-fit line shown. The 95% bootstrap confidence interval for the R2 value of 0.543 was 0.459–0.618.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Using deviation values as traits in linkage mapping.
a Histogram of broad sense heritability (H2) values for all gRNAs with background effects. b Histogram of the ratio between narrow sense heritability (h2) and H2 for all gRNAs with background effects, shown as (1 - h2/H2). c Linkage mapping on deviation values. Upper panel: Visualization of all 2x-log10(pval) drops for the gRNAs with significant peaks. Each row is a unique gRNA. Locations of major fitness loci are indicated by black bars. Lower panel: Number of overlapping 2x-log10(pval) drops at each nucleotide position along the genome. Regions where more intervals overlap than expected by chance (hubs) are shown in unique colors. Vertical lines indicate chromosome boundaries. Linkage mapping results for the replicate assay (ATC2) are available as Supplemental Fig. 17. Mapping was performed as described in the Methods section ‘Linkage mapping’. d Histogram of all effect sizes for the detected loci. These values were obtained from the linear model used for linkage mapping, deviations ~ locus, taking the coefficient of the locus term. This is roughly equivalent to the difference between the mean deviation value of segregants carrying the 3S allele and the mean deviation value of segregants carrying the BY allele. e Histogram of the proportion of heritability explained by each detected locus, calculated as R2/H2. f Interaction plots connecting gRNA location to the locations of interacting loci shown in Fig. 3c.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Features of and comparisons between hubs.
Effects of the Chr VII (a), XIV (b), X (c), and XIII (d) hubs on mean fitness and deviation value across gRNAs that interact with each hub. Dot plots in upper panels: Effects of the hub on mean fitness when each interacting gRNA is induced. Control indicates a subset of 1294 gRNAs with no phenotypic effect in our data set, as determined by gRNAs with p-values greater than 0.8 for both the mean effect term and the background effect term in a mixed effects linear model (see Methods section ‘Identification and quantification of gRNA effects’). Orange points show the mean fitness of all genotypes with the 3S allele at the peak marker for that gRNA’s interacting locus and green points show genotypes with the BY allele. The fitnesses of replicate barcodes were averaged before calculating the mean for each genotype. Vertical bars for each point indicate standard error. The control data used the center of the hub instead of a peak marker. The gRNAs are ordered on the x-axis by the magnitude of their mean effect. Barplots in lower panels: Effects of a hub on deviation values across interacting gRNAs. The change in deviation values was calculated by taking the mean of all deviation values among genotypes with the 3S allele at the peak marker and subtracting the mean of all deviations among genotypes with the BY allele. The control data has no deviation values.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Interaction networks for each hub.
Visualization of the interaction networks for the Chr VII (a), XIV (b), X (c), and XIII (d) hubs via spatial analysis of functional enrichment,. A list of all genes targeted by a gRNA in this hub were used as a query at thecellmap.org to create these images, at a significance of p ≤ 0.05.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mullis MN, Matsui T, Schell R, Foree R, Ehrenreich IM. The complex underpinnings of genetic background effects. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3548. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06023-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandler CH, Chari S, Dworkin I. Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution. Trends Genet. 2013;29:358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.01.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nadeau JH. Modifier genes in mice and humans. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001;2:165–174. doi: 10.1038/35056009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinreich DM, Delaney NF, DePristo MA, Hartl DL. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science. 2006;312:111–114. doi: 10.1126/science.1123539. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kryazhimskiy S, Rice DP, Jerison ER, Desai MM. Global epistasis makes adaptation predictable despite sequence-level stochasticity. Science. 2014;344:1519–1522. doi: 10.1126/science.1250939. - DOI - PMC - PubMed