Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade
- PMID: 38762601
- DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00905-7
Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade
Abstract
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs decision) has already had profound impact on reproductive health care in the United States. Some studies have reported increased incidence of vasectomy after the Dobbs decision. The Military Health System (MHS) provides a unique opportunity to evaluate this relationship in a universally insured, geographically representative population. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of vasectomies among all male beneficiaries in the MHS, ages 18 to 64, from 2018 to 2022. Beneficiaries receiving a vasectomy were identified via billing data extraction from the MHS Data Repository (MDR). Descriptive statistics of demographic factors of all those receiving a vasectomy in the study period were evaluated. Crude and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate for differences in demographic variables in those receiving a vasectomy pre-Dobb's decision as compared to after the Dobb's decision. The total number of men receiving a vasectomy each month over the study period was analyzed, as were the numbers in a state immediately implementing abortion access restrictions (Texas), and one without any restrictions on abortion access (Virginia). Our analysis found that men receiving a vasectomy post-Dobbs decision were more likely to be younger, unmarried, and of junior military rank than prior to the Dobbs decision. In the months following the Dobbs decision in 2022 (June-December), there was a 22.1% increase in vasectomy utilization as compared to the averages of those months in 2018-2021. Further, it was found that the relative increase in vasectomy after the Dobbs decision was greater in Texas (29.3%) compared to Virginia (10.6%). Our findings highlight the impact of the Dobbs decision on reproductive health care utilization outside of abortion.
© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Similar articles
-
Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States.Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):265-268. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x. Epub 2023 Feb 14. Int J Impot Res. 2024. PMID: 36788351 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.Am J Mens Health. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):15579883241260511. doi: 10.1177/15579883241260511. Am J Mens Health. 2024. PMID: 38872304 Free PMC article.
-
Short-Term Changes in Vasectomy Consults and Procedures Following Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.Urol Pract. 2024 May;11(3):517-525. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000528. Epub 2024 Feb 5. Urol Pract. 2024. PMID: 38315830
-
The Dobbs Decision and the Future of Occupational Health in the US.Occup Health Sci. 2023;7(1):1-37. doi: 10.1007/s41542-023-00143-1. Epub 2023 Feb 20. Occup Health Sci. 2023. PMID: 36843836 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A review of the changing landscape of vasectomy trends in the United States in the post-dobbs era.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01053-2. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 40185908 Review.
References
-
- Kulczycki A. Dobbs: navigating the new quagmire and its impacts on abortion and reproductive health care. Health Educ Behav Off Publ Soc Public Health Educ. 2022;49:924–8.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources