Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 19;21(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00349-4.

Comparing the effects of aquatic-based exercise and land-based exercise on balance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Comparing the effects of aquatic-based exercise and land-based exercise on balance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ying Deng et al. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Balance plays a crucial role in the daily activities of older adults. Aquatic-based exercises (AE) are widely conducted as an alternative to land-based exercises (LE). Previous studies have compared AE and LE as effective ways to improve balance and have yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, this review aimed to compare the effects of AE and LE on balance function in older adults.

Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, were searched. Randomized controlled trials published from January 2003 to June 2023 were included following predetermined criteria. Data extraction was carried out by two independent reviewers. Data synthesis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The fixed-effect model or random-effect model was chosen based on the results of the heterogeneity test. Meta-analysis for the effect sizes of balance outcomes was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. This review was registered at PROSPERO CRD42023429557.

Results: A total of 29 studies involving 1486 older adults (with an average age of 66.2 years) were included. Meta-analysis results indicated that AE could improve balance ability based on two tests: the Berg balance scale (BBS: SMD = 1.13, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.00, p = 0.01, I2 = 94%) and the 30-s chair stand test (30 CST: SMD = 2.02, 95% CI 0.50 to 3.54, p = 0.009, I2 = 96%). However, there were no significant differences between the AE group and the LE group in terms of the 6-min walking test (6 MWT: SMD = 0.13, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.43, p = 0.38, I2 = 62%) and time up to go test (TUGT: SMD = 0.44, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.91, p = 0.07, I2 = 85%). Older adults with different health conditions have different gains in different balance measurements after AE intervention and LE intervention.

Conclusions: Although this was influenced by participant health status, transfer effects, sample size, and other factors, AE offers better benefits than LE for improving balance function in older adults.

Keywords: Aquatic exercise; Balance; Meta-analysis; Older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the study selection process according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-analysis (PRIAMA)
Fig.2
Fig.2
Funnel plot for all the meta-analyses
Fig.3
Fig.3
Meta-analysis (A) and sensitivity analysis (B) of the aquatic-based exercise (AE) versus the land-based exercise (LE) on balance performance. CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation
Fig.4
Fig.4
Meta-analysis of the aquatic-based exercise (AE) versus the land-based exercise (LE) on different balance outcomes according to different populations. A: Berg balance scale; B: Time up to go test; C: 6-min walking test; D: 30-s chair stand test; BBS, Berg balance scale; TUGT, time up to go test; 6 MWT, 6-min walking test; 30 CST, 30-s chair stand test; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Chadarevian S. Human population studies and the world health organization. Dynamis. 2015;35(2):359–388. doi: 10.4321/S0211-95362015000200005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weber D, Scherbov S. Prospects of activity limitations among older adults in 23 low and middle income countries. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67166-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, et al. Health, functioning, and disability in older adults—present status and future implications. The Lancet. 2015;385(9967):563–575. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61462-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stevens JA, Mack KA, Paulozzi LJ, et al. Self-reported falls and fall-related injuries among persons aged>or=65 years–united states, 2006. J Safety Res. 2008;39(3):345–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartley P, Forsyth F, Rowbotham S, et al. The use of the world guidelines for falls prevention and management's risk stratification algorithm in predicting falls in the irish longitudinal study on ageing (tilda). Age Ageing, 2023, 52(7): afad129. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources