Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr-Jun;12(2):125-133.
doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_510_23. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

Impact of Privatization on Healthcare System: A Systematic Review

Tareq M Alayed  1 , Assem S Alrumeh  2 , Ibrahim A Alkanhal  3 , Raghad T Alhuthil  4
Affiliations
Review

Impact of Privatization on Healthcare System: A Systematic Review

Tareq M Alayed et al. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background: A notable shift in healthcare policy is healthcare privatization, which refers to the transfer of ownership, management, or provision of healthcare services from the public sector to private entities.

Objectives: To provide a narrative examination of the impact of privatization on various dimensions of healthcare, including quality, equity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. Policymakers can utilize the findings of this study to make well-informed decisions regarding privatization strategies.

Materials and methods: A systematic review was implemented using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies conducted from January 2000 to January 2023 in developing or developed countries that assessed the impact of healthcare privatization on population health within public sector institutions were included.

Results: Eleven studies were included. The findings revealed diverse perspectives on the impact of healthcare privatization, with four studies (36.4%) supporting privatization (two of these were conducted in Saudi Arabia), six studies (54.5%) opposing it (three of these were conducted in European countries), and one study (9.1%) taking a neutral stance. Two studies investigated the impact on healthcare quality, and both revealed that privatization negatively impacts uninsured patients and low-income populations. In addition, five studies investigated the healthcare access and equity dimensions following privatization: one was in favor, one was neutral, and three were opposing it. Four studies investigated the cost-effectiveness dimension, with three in favor and one study opposing it.

Conclusion: This review highlights different perspectives on healthcare privatization. While studies, as those from Saudi Arabia, suggest benefits in terms of efficiency and innovation, others, particularly from European countries, emphasize negative consequences such as inequity and reduced quality. This emphasizes the need for more investigations to understand privatization's impact on healthcare.

Keywords: Access to care; healthcare; healthcare delivery; impact; private sector; privatization; quality of health care; system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PRISMA flow diagram depicts the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review
Figure 2
Figure 2
Categorization of the included studies’ conclusion toward healthcare privatization
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Saltman RB, Durán A, Dubois HF. Governing public hospitals: Reform strategies and the movement towards institutional autonomy. [[Last accessed 2023 Sept 24]];Health Policy. 2019 123:827–32. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/326425 .
    1. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. Public health's falling share of US health spending. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:56–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levi B, Zehavi A. Religious and ethnic identities influence on public views of privatization: The case of Israel. Policy Stud. 2023;44:236–57.
    1. Duggan M, Gupta A, Jackson E, Templeton ZS. The Impact of Privatization: Evidence from the Hospital Sector. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2023.
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources