Acute and Long-Term Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury at a Quaternary Referral Level 1 Trauma Center: The Memphis Experience and Comparison of a New Scoring System
- PMID: 38767366
- DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002988
Acute and Long-Term Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury at a Quaternary Referral Level 1 Trauma Center: The Memphis Experience and Comparison of a New Scoring System
Abstract
Background and objectives: The management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) remains an important topic within trauma and neurosurgery today. There remains a lack of consensus within the literature and significant variation across institutions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate management of BCVI at a large, tertiary referral trauma center.
Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to conduct a retrospective review of patients with BCVI at our Level 1 Trauma Center. Computed tomography angiography was used to identify BCVI for each patient. Patient information was collected, and statistical analysis was performed. With the included risk factors for ischemic complications, a novel scoring system based on ischemic risk, the "Memphis Score," was developed and evaluated to grade BCVI.
Results: Two hundred seventeen patients with BCVI from July 2020 to August 2022 were identified. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (141, 65.0%). Vertebral arteries were the most common vessel injured (136, 51.1%) with most injuries occurring at a high cervical location (101, 38.0%). Denver Grade 1 injuries (89, 33.5%) and a Memphis Score of 1 were most frequent (172, 64.6%), and initial anticoagulation with heparin drip was initiated 56.7% of the time (123). Endovascular treatment was required in 24 patients (11.1%) and was usually performed in the first 48 hours (15, 62.5%). While Denver Grade ( P = .019) and Memphis Score ( P < .00001) were significantly higher in those patients undergoing endovascular treatment, only the Memphis Score demonstrated a significant difference between those patients who had stroke or worsening on follow-up imaging and those who did not ( P = .0009).
Conclusion: Although BCVI management has improved since early investigative efforts, institutions must evaluate and share their data to help clarify outcomes. The novel "Memphis Score" presents a standardized framework to communicate ischemic risk and guide management of BCVI.
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, Brega KE, Franciose RJ, Burch JM. Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. J Trauma. 1999;47(5):845-853.
-
- Biffl WL, Ray CE Jr., Moore EE, et al. Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography. Ann Surg. 2002;235(5):699-707; discussion 706-707.
-
- Biffl WL, Cothren CC, Moore EE, et al. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Trauma. 2009;67(6):1150-1153.
-
- Cothren CC, Biffl WL, Moore EE, Kashuk JL, Johnson JL. Treatment for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: equivalence of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. Arch Surg. 2009;144(7):685-690.
-
- Wei CW, Montanera W, Selchen D, Lian J, Stevens C, de Tilly LN. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and management outcomes. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010;37(5):574-579.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources