Primary eyecare in paediatrics population (PREPP) - II study: Study of satisfaction of services and barrier for not reporting to the base hospital on referral among pediatric patients treated in six major vision centers of a tertiary eye care facility in Southern India
- PMID: 38767560
- PMCID: PMC11727932
- DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2471_23
Primary eyecare in paediatrics population (PREPP) - II study: Study of satisfaction of services and barrier for not reporting to the base hospital on referral among pediatric patients treated in six major vision centers of a tertiary eye care facility in Southern India
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted in continuation of Primary Eyecare in Paediatrics Population (PREPP-I) and was aimed to assess parents' satisfaction with pediatric-eye-care services across six vision centers (VCs) of a tertiary eye hospital in Southern India. The barriers among the parents for not attending the base hospital (BH) when referred from these VCs were also evaluated.
Methods: A standard-validated-satisfaction questionnaire (VSQ) was used to assess patient satisfaction. Responses were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) against each response. Responses were expressed as percentages with 0 (very dissatisfied) and 100% (very satisfied). Patients were referred with a form mentioning reasons for referral (urgent/non-urgent). All referrals were evaluated by the principal investigator. In case of failure to report, parents were enquired about the barrier based on the validated barrier questionnaire (VBQ) over a telephonic conversation.
Results: All 250 patients of the PREPP-1 study were included in the satisfaction study. Different domains were evaluated using VSQ (accessibility of VC, waiting hours, financial aspects, spectacle dispensing service, and teleophthalmology). The overall satisfaction was 75%. The most common reason for dissatisfaction was the lack of meeting the ophthalmologist in person, followed by waiting time. 58 patients wanted to visit BH to consult a pediatric ophthalmologist in person (23%). For the barrier study, 14 out of 47 referrals did not report and were evaluated using VBQ (knowledge, physical, time, and financial barriers). The majority had a financial barrier (43%), followed by knowledge (28.6%) and time barrier (14%).
Conclusion: PREPP-II demonstrated that 3/4 th of pediatric patients are happy to be treated at VC with teleophthalmology services. However, a significant percentage want to consult a specialist at BH. One-fourth of total referrals did not report to BH due to financial constraints and a lack of awareness of the child's condition.
Copyright © 2024 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization Cumulative official updates to ICD–Feb 2009. [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 12]
-
- Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19:127–40. Available from: https://www.v2020eresource.org/home/newsletter/news122005#6 . [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 12] - PubMed
-
- Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright R, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6:247–63. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
