Assessment of Repetitive Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) Cycles on Oocyte Donors: Impact on Oocyte Quality and Viable Embryo Yield
- PMID: 38767768
- PMCID: PMC11392993
- DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01584-x
Assessment of Repetitive Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) Cycles on Oocyte Donors: Impact on Oocyte Quality and Viable Embryo Yield
Abstract
The utilization of donor eggs has broadened the options for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) among women facing challenges with egg quantity or quality. Given that donors are typically selected from young and fertile individuals, In Vitro Fertilization with egg donation (IVF-ED) tends to exhibit higher rates of implantation, pregnancy, and live births compared to IVF with the woman's own eggs, especially for females over 35 years old. This has led to a projected increase in the demand for IVF-ED, surpassing the number of available donors. Consequently, many centers opt to use oocyte donors for multiple cycles. However, the correlation between repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) cycles and the performance of donors in terms of viable blastocyst stage embryo (VEC) or blastocyst embryo rate is not definitively established and remains of interest. This study aims to explore the preimplantation characteristics of embryo development and oocyte maturation status based on the number of donor COS cycles, employing a Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) framework. The study encompasses 1965 embryo transfer (ET) cycles involving 399 donors who underwent a minimum of two and a maximum of nine controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COS) cycles. The findings indicate that, with the patient undergoing six or more cycles of ovarian stimulation, despite a 3.9% increase in both maturation and fertilization rates, there is a corresponding decrease of 4.5% in VEC rate and 4.7% in blastulation rates. In essence, an escalating number of donor COS cycles appears to be associated with a disadvantageous reduction in embryo quality.
Keywords: Egg donation; Egg donor; Embryo quality; IVF; Repeated COS.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Figures

References
-
- Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. SART national summary report 2016. https://www.sartcorsonline.com/CSR/PublicSnapshotReport?ClinicPKID=&repo...: Accessed 1 Jan 2024.
-
- De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European society of human reproduction and embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1586–601. 10.1093/humrep/dey242. 10.1093/humrep/dey242 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources