Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 1;37(3):188-200.
doi: 10.3344/kjp.24069.

Beyond measurement: a deep dive into the commonly used pain scales for postoperative pain assessment

Affiliations
Review

Beyond measurement: a deep dive into the commonly used pain scales for postoperative pain assessment

Seungeun Choi et al. Korean J Pain. .

Abstract

This review explores the essential methodologies for effective postoperative pain management, focusing on the need for thorough pain assessment tools, as underscored in various existing guidelines. Herein, the strengths and weaknesses of commonly used pain scales for postoperative pain-the Visual Analog Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, Verbal Rating Scale, and Faces Pain Scale-are evaluated, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate assessment tools based on factors influencing their effectiveness in surgical contexts. By emphasizing the need to comprehend the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for these scales in evaluating new analgesic interventions and monitoring pain trajectories over time, this review advocates recognizing the limitations of common pain scales to improve pain assessment strategies, ultimately enhancing postoperative pain management. Finally, five recommendations for pain assessment in research on postoperative pain are provided: first, selecting an appropriate pain scale tailored to the patient group, considering the strengths and weaknesses of each scale; second, simultaneously assessing the intensity of postoperative pain at rest and during movement; third, conducting evaluations at specific time points and monitoring trends over time; fourth, extending the focus beyond the intensity of postoperative pain to include its impact on postoperative functional recovery; and lastly, interpreting the findings while considering the MCID, ensuring that it is clinically significant for the chosen pain scale. These recommendations broaden our understanding of postoperative pain and provide insights that contribute to more effective pain management strategies, thereby enhancing patient care outcomes.

Keywords: Pain; Pain Measurement; Perioperative Care; Postoperative; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Period; Visual Analog Scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Ho-Jin Lee is a section editor for the Korean Journal of Pain; however, he has not been involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process for this article. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Commonly used faces pain scales for postoperative pain management. (A) Faces Pain Scale–Revised (FPS-R). (B) Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. Permission to use the original illustration of the Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale has been granted by the Wong-Baker FACES Foundation. Permission to use the original illustration of the FPS-R has been granted by the International Association for the Study of Pain.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale. (A) Pain intensity item. (B) The supplemental questions of the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale. Permission to use this original illustration has been obtained from the Defense & Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Recommendations for pain evaluation in studies concerning postoperative pain. MCID: minimal clinically important difference.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu CL, Richman JM. Postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004;17:455–60. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200410000-00017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon SH, Bae J, Yoon S, Na KJ, Lee HJ. Correlation between pain intensity and quality of recovery after video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer resection. J Pain Res. 2023;16:3343–52. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S426570. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berkowitz R, Vu J, Brummett C, Waljee J, Englesbe M, Howard R. The impact of complications and pain on patient satisfaction. Ann Surg. 2021;273:1127–34. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003621. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Boekel RLM, Warlé MC, Nielen RGC, Vissers KCP, van der Sande R, Bronkhorst EM, et al. Relationship between postoperative pain and overall 30-day complications in a broad surgical population: an observational study. Ann Surg. 2019;269:856–65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002583. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim BR, Yoon SH, Lee HJ. Practical strategies for the prevention and management of chronic postsurgical pain. Korean J Pain. 2023;36:149–62. doi: 10.3344/kjp.23080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources