Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 May 20;24(1):178.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02559-w.

Mortality and cardiac arrest rates of emergency surgery in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Mortality and cardiac arrest rates of emergency surgery in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kaikai Guo et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: The magnitude of the risk of death and cardiac arrest associated with emergency surgery and anesthesia is not well understood. Our aim was to assess whether the risk of perioperative and anesthesia-related death and cardiac arrest has decreased over the years, and whether the rates of decrease are consistent between developed and developing countries.

Methods: A systematic review was performed using electronic databases to identify studies in which patients underwent emergency surgery with rates of perioperative mortality, 30-day postoperative mortality, or perioperative cardiac arrest. Meta-regression and proportional meta-analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed to evaluate global data on the above three indicators over time and according to country Human Development Index (HDI), and to compare these results according to country HDI status (low vs. high HDI) and time period (pre-2000s vs. post-2000s).

Results: 35 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing more than 3.09 million anesthetic administrations to patients undergoing anesthesia for emergency surgery. Meta-regression showed a significant association between the risk of perioperative mortality and time (slope: -0.0421, 95%CI: from - 0.0685 to -0.0157; P = 0.0018). Perioperative mortality decreased over time from 227 per 10,000 (95% CI 134-380) before the 2000s to 46 (16-132) in the 2000-2020 s (p < 0-0001), but not with increasing HDI. 30-day postoperative mortality did not change significantly (346 [95% CI: 303-395] before the 2000s to 292 [95% CI: 201-423] in the 2000s-2020 period, P = 0.36) and did not decrease with increasing HDI status. Perioperative cardiac arrest rates decreased over time, from 113 per 10,000 (95% CI: 31-409) before the 2000s to 31 (14-70) in the 2000-2020 s, and also with increasing HDI (68 [95% CI: 29-160] in the low-HDI group to 21 [95% CI: 6-76] in the high-HDI group, P = 0.012).

Conclusions: Despite increasing baseline patient risk, perioperative mortality has decreased significantly over the past decades, but 30-day postoperative mortality has not. A global priority should be to increase long-term survival in both developed and developing countries and to reduce overall perioperative cardiac arrest through evidence-based best practice in developing countries.

Keywords: 30-day postoperative mortality; Cardiac arrests; Emergency surgery; Perioperative mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of study identification
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias assessment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-regression of perioperative mortality (a, b), 30-day mortality (c, d) outcomes by decades (a, c) and country’s Human Development Index status (b, d). Every circle represents a study; the circle size is representative of the weight of that study in the analysis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Meta-regression of perioperative cardiac arrest (a, b) rates outcomes by decades (a) and country’s Human Development Index status (b). Every circle represents a study; the circle size is representative of the weight of that study in the analysis

Similar articles

References

    1. Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128–37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1010705. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braz LG, Modolo NS, do Nascimento P, Jr, Bruschi BA, Castiglia YM, Ganem EM, de Carvalho LR, Braz JR. Perioperative cardiac arrest: a study of 53,718 anaesthetics over 9 year from a Brazilian teaching hospital. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(5):569–75. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael065. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmed A, Ali M, Khan EA, Khan MU. An audit of perioperative cardiac arrests in a southeast Asian university teaching hospital over 15 years. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36(5):710–6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0803600514. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zuercher M, Ummenhofer W. Cardiac arrest during anesthesia. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(3):269–74. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f948cd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tamdee D, Charuluxananan S, Punjasawadwong Y, Tawichasri C, Kyokong O, Patumanond J, Rodanant O, Leelanukrom R. Factors related to 24-hour perioperative cardiac arrest in geriatric patients in a Thai university hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(2):198–207. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms