Temporal trends with the Evolut family of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves: A single-center experience
- PMID: 38769727
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31088
Temporal trends with the Evolut family of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves: A single-center experience
Abstract
Background: The Evolut self-expanding valve (SEV) systems (Medtronic), were designed to accommodate varying valve sizes and reduce paravalvular leak (PVL) while maintaining a low delivery profile. These systems have evolved between product generations, alongside valve deployment techniques changing over time.
Aims: This study aimed to examine whether these changes impacted clinical outcomes.
Methods: EPROMPT is a prospective, investigator-initiated, postmarketing registry of consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the Evolut PRO/PRO+ SEV system. A total of 300 patients were divided into three consecutive cohorts of 100 patients according to implantation date (January to October 2018, November 2018 to July 2020, and August 2020 to November 2021). Procedural and clinical outcomes over these time periods were compared.
Results: Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 device implantation success improved over time (70.0% vs. 78.0% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.01), with a similar trend for VARC-3 device success (94.7% vs. 81.7% vs. 96.8%, p < 0.001). PVL (all degrees) frequency was likewise reduced over time (31.0% vs. 17.0% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.04). Furthermore, a trend was noticed toward shorter procedure times and shorter length of stay. However, postprocedural pacemaker implantation rates did not significantly differ (15.2% vs. 21.1% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.43).
Conclusion: During a 3-year period, we demonstrated better TAVR outcomes with newer SEV iterations, alongside changes in implantation techniques, which might result in better procedural and clinical outcomes. However, we did not see a significant change in peri-procedural pacemaker rates for SEV.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03423459.
Keywords: TAVR; aortic stenosis; self‐expanding valve.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Waksman R, Corso PJ, Torguson R, et al. TAVR in low‐risk patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:901‐907.
-
- Wyler von Ballmoos MC, Reardon MJ, Williams MR, et al. Three‐year outcomes with a contemporary self‐expanding transcatheter valve from the Evolut PRO US clinical study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021;26:12‐16.
-
- Forrestal BJ, Case BC, Yerasi C, et al. Risk of coronary obstruction and feasibility of coronary access after repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the self‐expanding evolut valve: a computed tomography simulation study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e009496.
-
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143:e72‐e227.
-
- Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium‐2 consensus document (VARC‐2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S45‐S60.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical