The science behind the nose: correlating volatile organic compound characterisation with canine biodetection of COVID-19
- PMID: 38770004
- PMCID: PMC11103684
- DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00007-2024
The science behind the nose: correlating volatile organic compound characterisation with canine biodetection of COVID-19
Abstract
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic stimulated the advancement and research in the field of canine scent detection of COVID-19 and volatile organic compound (VOC) breath sampling. It remains unclear which VOCs are associated with positive canine alerts. This study aimed to confirm that the training aids used for COVID-19 canine scent detection were indeed releasing discriminant COVID-19 VOCs detectable and identifiable by gas chromatography (GC-MS).
Methods: Inexperienced dogs (two Labradors and one English Springer Spaniel) were trained over 19 weeks to discriminate between COVID-19 infected and uninfected individuals and then independently validated. Getxent tubes, impregnated with the odours from clinical gargle samples, used during the canines' maintenance training process were also analysed using GC-MS.
Results: Three dogs were successfully trained to detect COVID-19. A principal components analysis model was created and confirmed the ability to discriminate between VOCs from positive and negative COVID-19 Getxent tubes with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 77%. Two VOCs were found to be very predictive of positive COVID-19 cases. When comparing the dogs with GC-MS, F1 and Matthew's correlation coefficient, correlation scores of 0.69 and 0.37 were observed, respectively, demonstrating good concordance between the two methods.
Interpretation: This study provides analytical confirmation that canine training aids can be safely and reliably produced with good discrimination between positive samples and negative controls. It is also a further step towards better understanding of canine odour discrimination of COVID-19 as the scent of interest and defining what VOC elements the canines interpret as "essential".
Copyright ©The authors 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors acknowledge that part of the work presented hereby has been funded by Health Canada as part of The Safe Restart Agreement program. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest pertinent to this work.
Figures




Similar articles
-
In search of COVID-19: The ability of biodetection canines to detect COVID-19 odours from clinical samples.J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2022 Nov 29;7(4):343-349. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2022-0017. eCollection 2022 Nov. J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2022. PMID: 37397821 Free PMC article.
-
Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 18;8:749588. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.749588. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34869443 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Biological Sensors and Instrumental Analysis to Discriminate COVID-19 Odor Signatures.Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;12(11):1003. doi: 10.3390/bios12111003. Biosensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36421122 Free PMC article.
-
Unraveling the potential of breath and sweat VOC capture devices for human disease detection: a systematic-like review of canine olfaction and GC-MS analysis.Front Chem. 2023 Nov 1;11:1282450. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1282450. eCollection 2023. Front Chem. 2023. PMID: 38025078 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The potential of volatile organic compounds-based breath analysis for COVID-19 screening: a systematic review & meta-analysis.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;102(2):115589. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115589. Epub 2021 Oct 30. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 34879323 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Study of sampling phases for body odor sampling prior to analysis by TD-GC×GC/ToFMS.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025 Jun;417(14):3177-3190. doi: 10.1007/s00216-025-05857-5. Epub 2025 Apr 14. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2025. PMID: 40227355 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tsao J, Kussman AL, Costales C, et al. . Accuracy of rapid antigen vs reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in college athletes during prevalence of the omicron variant. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5: e2217234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17234 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous