Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;5(3):301-319.
doi: 10.18001/trs.5.3.8.

Classification Accuracy of Biomarkers of Compliance

Affiliations

Classification Accuracy of Biomarkers of Compliance

Jeffrey A Boatman et al. Tob Regul Sci. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the classification accuracy of biomarkers of nicotine exposure for identifying noncompliance in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes.

Methods: We combined data from 2 studies to evaluate the classification accuracy of biomarkers of nicotine exposure for identifying noncompliance in RCTs of VLNC cigarettes. Using a novel approach that did not require knowledge of each participant's compliance status, we modeled the distributions of total nicotine equivalents (TNE), total cotinine, and anatabine in compliant and noncompliant participants using a mixture model. Estimates of the classification accuracy were derived from the estimated densities.

Results: TNE and total cotinine had near-perfect classification accuracy, but TNE had better classification accuracy than total cotinine (p = 0.03) and anatabine (p = 0.014). The classification accuracy of TNE and total cotinine decreased as self-reported study cigarettes increased; anatabine was similar, but the results were more statistically variable.

Conclusions: TNE and total cotinine are better classifiers of compliance than anatabine. These results will be useful in determining biomarker thresholds for identifying noncompliance and will aid in the interpretation of future RCTs of VLNC cigarettes.

Keywords: ROC curve; classification accuracy; noncompliance; very low nicotine content cigarettes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
ROC curves for discriminating compliers and non-compliers using the biomarkers TNE, total cotinine, and anatabine.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Association between biomarkers and cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) in compliers component and non-compliers component distributions
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Measures of classification of compliance by TNE
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Measures of classification of compliance by Cotinine
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Measures of classification of compliance by Anatabine

References

    1. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (H.R. 1256). June 2009.
    1. Donny EC, Denlinger RL, Tidey JW, et al. Randomized trial of reduced-nicotine standards for cigarettes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1340–1349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. 4th ed. Springer International Publishing; 2010.
    1. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(7):578–586. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cain LE, Cole SR. Inverse probability-of-censoring weights for the correction of time-varying noncompliance in the effect of randomized highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death. Stat Med. 2009;28:1725–1738. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources