Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;16(8):864-887.
doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13211. Epub 2024 May 21.

AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management

Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez  1 , Preeti Raghavan  2 , Jessica Pruente  3 , Daniel Moon  4 , Cassandra M List  5 , Joseph Edward Hornyak  3 , Fatma Gul  6 , Supreet Deshpande  7   8 , Susan Biffl  9 , Zainab Al Lawati  8 , Abraham Alfaro  10
Affiliations

AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management

Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez et al. PM R. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) conducted a comprehensive review in 2021 to identify opportunities for enhancing the care of adult and pediatric patients with spasticity. A technical expert panel (TEP) was convened to develop consensus-based practice recommendations aimed at addressing gaps in spasticity care.

Objective: To develop consensus-based practice recommendations to identify and address gaps in spasticity care.

Methods: The Spasticity TEP engaged in a 16-month virtual meeting process, focusing on formulating search terms, refining research questions, and conducting a structured evidence review. Evidence quality was assessed by the AAPM&R Evidence, Quality and Performance Committee (EQPC), and a modified Delphi process was employed to achieve consensus on recommendation statements and evidence grading. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) guided the rating of individual studies and the strength of recommendations.

Results: The TEP approved five recommendations for spasticity management and five best practices for assessment and management, with one recommendation unable to be graded due to evidence limitations. Best practices were defined as widely accepted components of care, while recommendations required structured evidence reviews and grading. The consensus guidance statement represents current best practices and evidence-based treatment options, intended for use by PM&R physicians caring for patients with spasticity.

Conclusion: This consensus guidance provides clinicians with practical recommendations for spasticity assessment and management based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. Clinical judgment should be exercised, and recommendations tailored to individual patient needs, preferences, and risk profiles. The accompanying table summarizes the best practice recommendations for spasticity assessment and management, reflecting principles with little controversy in care delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Chang E, Ghosh N, Yanni D, Lee S, Alexandru D, Mozaffar T. A review of spasticity treatments: pharmacological and interventional approaches. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;25(1–2):11‐22. doi:10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.2013007945
    1. Gormley ME Jr, Krach LE, Piccini L. Spasticity management in the child with spastic quadriplegia. Eur J Neurol. 2001;8(Suppl 5):127‐135. doi:10.1046/j.1468‐1331.2001.00045.x
    1. Raghavan P. Neural basis of spasticity. In: Raghavan P, ed. Spasticity and Muscle Stiffness: Restoring Form and Function. 1st ed. Springer Nature; 2022.
    1. Lance JW. Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP, eds. Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control. Year Book Medical Publishers; 1980.
    1. Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(1–2):2‐6. doi:10.1080/09638280400014576

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources