Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Nov;46(11):2762-2775.
doi: 10.1002/hed.27746. Epub 2024 May 21.

Skull base surgery for malignant tumors: The 2nd international collaborative study (1995-2015)

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Skull base surgery for malignant tumors: The 2nd international collaborative study (1995-2015)

Jatin P Shah et al. Head Neck. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The current study presents the effort of a global collaborative group to review the management and outcomes of malignant tumors of the skull base worldwide.

Patients and methods: A total of 28 institutions contributed data on 3061 patients. Analysis evaluated clinical variables, survival outcomes, and multivariable factors associated with outcomes.

Results: The median age was 56 years (IQR 44-67). The open surgical approach was used in 55% (n = 1680) of cases, endoscopic resection was performed in 36% (n = 1087), and the combined approach in 9.6% (n = 294). With a median follow-up of 7.1 years, the 5-year OS DSS and RFS were 65%, 71.7% and 53%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, older age, comorbidities, histology, dural/intracranial involvement, positive margins, advanced stage, and primary site were independent prognostic factors for OS, DSS, and RFS. Adjuvant RT was a protective prognostic factor.

Conclusion: The progress across various disciplines may have contributed to improved OS and DSS in this study compared to previous reports.

Keywords: global collaboration; multimodality treatment; prognostic factors; skull base tumors; survival outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Oncoprint of patient demographics
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of histology
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overall Survival Curves Across Entire Cohort, Primary, and Recurrent Tumors
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Disease Specific Survival Curves Across Entire Cohort, Primary, and Recurrent
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) Curves Across Entire Cohort, Primary, and Recurrent Tumors (A), and Local, Regional and Distant Recurrence-Free Probability Curves (B)
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Recurrence Free Survival (RFS) Curves Across Entire Cohort, Primary, and Recurrent Tumors (A), and Local, Regional and Distant Recurrence-Free Probability Curves (B)
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Overall Survival (A), Disease Specific Survival (B) and Recurrence Free Survival (C) Curves Comparing Patients Undergoing Surgery Alone vs Combinations of Prior/Neoadjuvant and Radiotherapy (RT) and Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) Adjuvant Treatment.

References

    1. Ketcham AS, Wilkins RH, Vanburen JM, Smith RR. A Combined Intracranial Facial Approach to the Paranasal Sinuses. Am J Surg. 1963;106:698–703. - PubMed
    1. Krespi YP, Sisson GA. Skull base surgery in composite resection. Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108(11):681–684. - PubMed
    1. Cousins VC, Lund VJ, Cheesman AD. Craniofacial resection of extensive benign lesions of the anterior skull base. Aust N Z J Surg. 1987;57(8):515–520. - PubMed
    1. Janecka IP, Sen C, Sekhar LN, Ramasastry S, Curtin HD, Barnes EL, D’Amico F. Cranial base surgery: results in 183 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;110(6):539–546. - PubMed
    1. Pitman KT, Prokopakis EP, Aydogan B, et al. The role of skull base surgery for the treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the sinonasal tract. Head Neck. 1999;21(5):402–407. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources