Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jun 5;190(6):458-466.
doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvae053.

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion

Betina Biagetti et al. Eur J Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA).

Design: This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment.

Methods: Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality.

Results: Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline.

Conclusion: In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

Keywords: acromegaly; cabergoline; dopamine agonist; first-line treatment; prolactin; somatostatin receptor ligand.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources