Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303328.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303328. eCollection 2024.

Inequality of the crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Colombia

Affiliations

Inequality of the crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Colombia

Juan Miguel Gallego et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

In recent decades, policy initiatives involving increases in the tobacco tax have increased pressure on budget allocations in poor households. In this study, we examine this issue in the context of the expansion of the social welfare state that has taken place over the last two decades in several emerging economies. This study explores the case of Colombia between 1997 and 2011. In this period, the budget share of the poorest expenditure quintile devoted to tobacco products of smokers' households doubled. We analyse the differences between the poorest and richest quintiles concerning the changes in budget shares, fixing a reference population over time to avoid demographic composition confounders. We find no evidence of crowding-out of education or healthcare expenditures. This is likely to be the result of free universal access to health insurance and basic education for the poor. For higher-income households, tobacco crowds out expenditures on entertainment, leisure activities, and luxury expenditures. This finding should reassure policymakers who are keen to impose tobacco taxes as an element of their public health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Tobacco price evolution in Colombia.
Label: Authors’ calculations based on Consumer Price Index data.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Smoking prevalence and tobacco budget share by total expenditures.
Label: Authors’ calculations.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Self-reported health status and affiliation with the health system.
Label: Authors’ calculations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pierce JP, Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Hatziandreu EJ, Davis RM. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. JAMA. 1989. pp. 56–60. - PubMed
    1. de Vries H. Socio-economic differences in smoking: Dutch adolescents’ beliefs and behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41: 419–424. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00330-v - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavelaars AEJM, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP, Geurts JJM, Crialesi R, Grötvedt L, et al.. Educational differences in smoking: International comparison. Br Med J. 2000;320: 1102–1107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fernandez E, Schiaffino A, Borràs JM, Shafey O, Villalbí JR, la Vecchia C. Prevalence of cigarette smoking by birth cohort among males and females in Spain, 1910–1990. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2003;12: 57–62. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200302000-00009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries. Tob Control. 2005;14: 106–113. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008573 - DOI - PMC - PubMed